Smooth Targets for a Combat Magnum (pre-19)?

Joined
Jul 6, 2020
Messages
408
Reaction score
2,394
Location
Michigan
I have an opportunity to purchase this handsome set of smooth targets for my Combat Magnum that shipped in April of 1956. I believe they are period correct and have been nicely refinished. It was suggested to me that the profile may have been altered somewhat. Looking for opinions since the asking price is high and I hardly ever see these older ones for sale. Thanks for looking.

Mike
dee3a23c99bf4bc3c63935b42c678ddc.jpg
19c479c8e4ef6bbb60f33d2aed1ad56d.jpg
f79e0eb0af04ef88ad1928d8aefd489e.jpg
c55e527ebdb3cb4384d1e6fdd40759ce.jpg
75d3be60b0f5e6a8237451ebfe209845.jpg
de8a56205092695bb1024acc05dcb71e.jpg


Sent from my SM-G996U using Tapatalk
 
Register to hide this ad
To my recollection, uncheckered Target stocks were usually sold as factory aftermarket replacements. Also, the very early Combat Magnum stocks were walnut and these are very nice Goncalo Alves.

Lastly, you left out the photo of whether these have blued or stainless stock discs. :)
 
Lastly, you left out the photo of whether these have blued or stainless stock discs. :)

Thanks Murphydog! Sorry for the omission, they are black washers. Also, the escutcheons are flush with the stocks which predates 1969 I believe.

Sent from my SM-G996U using Tapatalk
 
Anyone have a letter to substantiate these stocks. I have # 262336 shipped 7-20-1956, with checkered walnut target stocks. My letter goes on to state that the GA's were not available until 8-1958 and for the M19. They cost $10 more than the walnut stocks. Big Larry
 
I am familiar with that profile on some early smooth K targets.

Mine are unrelieved though and are rosewood.

Seeing that on relieved grips not rosewood does give me some pause. It could be they were altered but if so a very good job.

On the back of the right grip where its lighter color is that filler or the natural look?

It does seem a bit out of the grain of the grip but it could be picture angle.
 
Refinished, wrong wood to be period correct for your gun, clearly visible gaps in the fit on the gun in the pictures and the Price is High

I would not be a buyer.

The two pieces of information that you have left out is why you are replacing your grips?

What kind of price do you call HIGH?

Those two issues might alter my opinion.

For me, I do not need my gun to be period correct as long as I like what I own

If the price is high I would simply have Cullina make me a set of presentation stocks from a wood that I like. I needed to do that with my Factory engraved Model 57 which left the Factory with checkered target stocks :(

These are French Cake Walnut

57%20Eng%20rs.jpg
 
Nice stocks but I believe Combat Magnums of that vintage came with walnut diamond targets. We've had that discussion a time or two here, about smooth targets on early Combat Magnums, one of those was about a gun I own on which I thought smooth targets look great. And they do, they apparently just didn't come that way from the factory.

Jeff
SWCA #1457
 
Those are known as smooth "Coke bottle style" grips which were introduced in the mid 1950s and were found in a variety of different woods according to Suprica's book. They have the coke bottle shape and a distinct flair at the base. Very hard to locate and the refinish is done well. A slight gap at the very bottom, but again, the grips are about seventy years old. Expensive or high priced is a relative term which only you can determine. So bottom line, they could be period correct for your Combat Magnum. In the 1950's you could get special options on grips and sights.
I like them.
 
Nice stocks but I believe Combat Magnums of that vintage came with walnut diamond targets. We've had that discussion a time or two here, about smooth targets on early Combat Magnums, one of those was about a gun I own on which I thought smooth targets look great. And they do, they apparently just didn't come that way from the factory.

Jeff
SWCA #1457
Jeff, you are spot on, mine letters as such. I just fell in love with these and was hoping they were at least period correct. Why? Not really sure.
a343649d312e1ecb941571cdafe77fbf.jpg


Sent from my SM-G996U using Tapatalk
 
Those are known as smooth "Coke bottle style" grips which were introduced in the mid 1950s and were found in a variety of different woods according to Suprica's book. They have the coke bottle shape and a distinct flair at the base.

I like them.

Leonard, I think you just sold me on them (gotta admit, I was looking for a reason)! For the record, the price is $280 all-in. I noticed the coke profile too. Thank you -

Mike, your neighbor from Livonia!
 
Last edited:
Seeing that on relieved grips not rosewood does give me some pause. It could be they were altered but if so a very good job.



On the back of the right grip where its lighter color is that filler or the natural look?



It does seem a bit out of the grain of the grip but it could be picture angle.

Paplinker, I thought that might be a repair as well. The seller (an acquaintance) was kind enough to send, without payment, for me to inspect. I cannot find evidence of a repair.

Thanks, Mike
,

Sent from my SM-G996U using Tapatalk
 
Regardless of whether they came on the gun originally, I see the oval shaped bottom with the distinctive flair at the rear. The only indicator of K cokes lacking is the checking pattern going below the butt (no checking). As for other details such as the type of wood, the escutcheons, etc. I might dismiss some of those considering how few unchecked K cokes were made, if any. If they were modified from some set from another era it was a pretty good job As a novice observer I can only say...I like them.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top