My First 1917, a Shooter

CH4

US Veteran
Joined
Jul 30, 2014
Messages
12,057
Reaction score
29,323
Location
Nevada
Stopped my buddy's to take a look at a commercial 1917. It was one of several that he picked up at a local auction.

It's definitely been refinished and suffers from push off. If the rest of the gun looked anything like what I found under the grips, it would explain the heavy polishing, which removed most of the roll marks. All numbers match.

Despite its flaw's, it's actually not a bad gun, especially for free.99. I replaced the replica grips with a pair of Ken's stags.



IMG_1050.webp
IMG_1053.webp
IMG_1056.webp
IMG_1049.webp
 
Last edited:
Register to hide this ad
Please let us know how the push off repairs go.

I had that problem with an old .22 Outdoorsman with a hump back hammer I was buying and returned the gun. I had no idea what would be involved fixing it and it also had firing pin marks on the cylinder face, so decided not to mess with it.
 
Please let us know how the push off repairs go.

I had that problem with an old .22 Outdoorsman with a hump back hammer I was buying and returned the gun. I had no idea what would be involved fixing it and it also had firing pin marks on the cylinder face, so decided not to mess with it.

I probably could have fixed it with a different trigger and/or a fine stone.
 
Like it. Interesting about the pitting on the frame under the stocks. My Commercial 1917 was refinished by a previous owner (I bought it at a local auction) and had the same issue. Roll marks on mine are still pretty good. Mine is tight and a great shooter. Regarding your stocks. They could be original. Per SCSW 4th, from 1900-1929 stock numbers were penciled on the back. They returned to stamping numbers in 1929. Picture of my stocks with stamped numbers. Pretty cool to be able to shoot a nearly 100 year old revolver.IMG_0700.webpIMG_0422.webpIMG_0424.webpIMG_0421.webpIMG_0423.webp
 
Stopped my buddy's to take a look at a commercial 1917. It was one of several that he picked up at a local auction.

It's definitely been refinished and suffers from push off. If the rest of the gun looked anything like what I found under the grips, it would explain the heavy polishing, which removed most of the roll marks. All numbers match.

Despite its flaw's, it's actually not a bad gun, especially for free.99. I replaced the replica grips with a pair of Ken's stags.



View attachment 787456
View attachment 787457
View attachment 787458
View attachment 787459
I've got one of those😜

Someone went totally maniacal with the buffing wheel on mine, but they did a pretty decent job of blueing. It was cheap and purty, with matching numbers, so I couldn't pass it up. I also went with a set of Ken's exquisite stags on it as well. IMG_8327.webpIMG_8326.webp
 
Looks great. My only 'safe queen' is a M1917 with a ship date of early 1918. It is pristine, and possibly never issued.
So, to solve this dilemma, I searched for a 'stand-in shooter' (any reason, right?) and ran upon a M1937 Brazilian that at some point had been Parkerized. Tight action and smooth after a clean-up. Put some repro M1917 grips on it.
It has made a fine woods gun with zero worries about getting beat up a little.
I load mostly .45 AR rounds for it and can get pretty close to .45 Colt performance from it with 255 gr LSWC bullets.
 

Attachments

  • M1937Brazilian2reszed.webp
    M1937Brazilian2reszed.webp
    109.4 KB · Views: 2

Latest posts

Back
Top