(1) Ten thousand people aren't going to show up. That's
wildly optimistic, and not even logistically-possible. Even presuming, for instance, people averaged 3 to a car, that's 3000 parking spaces.
(2) No, even if they did, it still wouldn't be covered. You're really underestimating media bias. Also, protip: that Saturday thing keeps coming up, it's no good for news, either.
(3) Even if it were covered, the Undecided 66% still wouldn't care. And like I said--it's on a Saturday. Nobody's going to see it with their own eyes, and the ones that are unlucky enough to live nearby are just going to be annoyed.
(4) Protests aren't organization. Everytown For Gun Safety is organization.
(5) Protests don't change anybody's mind. They already know we exist. Protests are sort of the problem. You get a few hundred sloppy neckbeards groaning about MUH RIGHTS, it sort've drowns out reasoned arguments about the criminalization of law-abiding citizens.
Otherwise the 66% in the middle are going to see THEM active and not see us at ALL. Most of them are not going to go to the Party A or Party B meetings.
The following is important. I'm not even kidding or trolling you.
Re-read the thing I wrote about one party knowing they can never get our votes, and the other side knowing we don't have an alternative but to vote for them. The point of that is that we don't have any political influence. Nobody is competing for our vote.
Now--if you want to block stupid legislation, you need influence. Raw votes aren't important, because in most cases, citizens
don't directly vote on legislation. So who does?
State legislators: the assembly and the senate.
Who picks the people who are going to run for state legislative positions?
The county political committees.
So when one gun owner shows up to a county party meeting, that person is sitting in a room with the folks who decide who decide who's going to get the party nominations for the state senate and assembly. There are elections, but they're basically
pro forma at that point. The more involved you get, the smaller the rooms get. Even just volunteering to pass out fliers or work phones during local and state elections buys you direct access. The people who will be deciding whether to vote for or against the next gun control measure in your state will shake your hand, ask you your name, and where you're from. And yeah, it makes an impression when you add "...from XYZ Rod and Gun Club" after your name.
And I can tell you: I have
watched the NRA back a candidate weak on guns, because the Party B committee chose that person over a strong 2A candidate.
Which is also why I say it doesn't matter whether a 2A-conscious gun owner is a Party A or a Party B. To be honest, we have a lot more influence if we're rooted into both of them. Not going to happen so long as Michael Bloomberg is around and Party A is broke as hell. Party A is short on cash but long on volunteer organizations. Party B is well-funded, but desperate for local volunteers...yet another reason why what I'm suggesting has the potential to be so effective. If they're dependent on us for volunteers, that's an awful lot of influence to wield.
And by the way: Party B has a
majority in the Florida state senate, 23 to 15, with a Party B governor. That's a lot of raw votes. So tell me--how the hell did they manage to get the most radical disenfranchisement of American citizens passed? Because Party B just didn't give a ****, because Florida gun owners have zero political influence.
Up next: Vermont!
Trying to fight the fight out on the street is hard work, and just isn't as effective as working the small rooms.