Holy cat balls. You tell some story about mounting a rifle scope affecting elevation and windage and you actually think that is relevant to drifting a rear sight in a solid steel dovetail? Like I said, the level of bad bad incorrect silliness masquerading as input is off the charts here.
Think this through. Drift a rear sight in a fixed dovetail and come up with any way that the elevation will shift. Give it a minute, mull it over. Ok, it can’t. Ever. Under any circumstance. It will affect windage. That’s it.
I got moderated for being mean. Ok. I own that. Yet you guys keep saying things that can’t actually happen. Go drift a rear sight in a handgun and report back as to elevation change. lol
I am no fanboy of this gun. I think it is a solid ccw choice. Accurate, soft shooting, tiny. Fits anywhere I might want to carry it. Good sights that I find easy to stack rounds with. I had to send one back for a defective manual safety. I use a pair of nail clippers to trim a mag follower. The RSA always has to have the spring edge placed under the lip of the guide rod to install like it should. I had to drift every single one of their sights to get them to shoot POA/POI. These should be addressed at the factory level. All that being said, the comments on this forum make the gun out to be awful. The 5 examples I have personally handled and shot are reliable, accurate, and hold a goodly amount for size. I owned a BG1.0. I find it amazing that some of you claim to like those better than the 2.0. That is crazy. It isn’t even close. Did we all forget that craptastic laser the 1.0 had? It was comically bad even when it worked. Which it didn’t from the factory. Horrible trigger. Bad sights. Low capacity. All in a gun basically the same size.