Shield in .357 Sig?

bossduce

Member
Joined
May 30, 2008
Messages
106
Reaction score
12
Location
Roanoke, VA
Over the last year I have purchased a Shield in 9mm and most recently in .45 acp. I am very very interested to see if they will ever come out with this in the fine platform of .357 Sig. I noticed the S&W website does not offer any simiauto, in any configuration, in this caliber. I see where they used to make a compact in .357 but I can't seem to find any of those either.

Anyone have any ideas as to why this is not an option or whether or not it may in the near future? It appears to me that Smith & Wesson has abandoned this great cartridge/caliber.
 
Register to hide this ad
I would say SW would not but if they did, I would buy one!
 
Last edited:
As a cartridge, .357S offers little advantage vs. its drawbacks in a short barreled, lightweight pistol.

My first .357S was a factory slide/barrel conversion for the Keltec P40 around 1996. That was a monster to shoot from an 18 oz. gun, and parts broke quickly. The project was discontinued in less than a year. Granted, it was a Keltec, OK, I get it. But other manufacturers went down the same road with similar conclusions.

Maximum SAAMI pressure spec for 9mm is 35,000 psi. For the .357 Sig, it is 40,000 psi. The additional flash and blast of the .357S round is not something I would look forward to from a 3.1" barrel Shield. The .357S is a high pressure round that benefits from barrel lengths around 5".

The list of manufacturer's making .357S guns is very short. The list of manufacturers not making them is long.

.357S is a niche cartridge with dedicated followers, but it is not a widely popular, money making cartridge for ammunition or handgun manufacturers. It has some advantages over other rounds, and some drawbacks. Apparently, the drawbacks outweigh the advantages in financial decisions of major manufacturers.

Standard 9mm expanding bullets are designed for velocities between about 1000 fps and 1250 fps. To function properly at velocities around 300 fps faster, 9mm bullets need to be tweaked for maximum performance. So, special bullets, special cases, special equipment to load the ammo, special guns to shoot the ammo, relatively low consumer demand = non-starter for major manufacturers.

For those who believe in the advantages, small aftermarket barrel makers stand ready to take your money to make your own .40-.357S conversions and beat yourself and your gun up with what amounts to +P++ 9mm ammo, but with reduced capacity at higher ammo costs with reduced loading choices and availability.
 
Last edited:
The list of manufacturer's making .357S guns is very short. The list of manufacturers not making them is long.

.357S is a niche cartridge with dedicated followers, but it is not a widely popular, money making cartridge for ammunition or handgun manufacturers. It has some advantages over other rounds, and some drawbacks. Apparently, the drawbacks outweigh the advantages in financial decisions of major manufacturers.

This
deal.gif


The Shields in .40 don't get a lot of love and aren't all that popular. I have one. I like it. But most folks don't. Can't help but think a .357 would be even less generally desired.
 
I don't know about holding up better, but I think shooting the high pressure .357S cartridge in any short barreled carry gun is counter productive. But don't let my opinion stop you if it's what you really, really want. You have your own needs and priorities that are justifiably different than mine.
 
Maybe it's just me but I find little or no difference in recoil between a 40 S & W, 357 Sig and hot 9mm. I shoot all three in my Glock 27, and carry 357 Sig as my EDC. But, I have been shooting large bore magnums since I was 17 or so and regularly carry a 454 Casull.

My accuracy is fine=last trip to the range, I put 28/30 into the head of a standard silhouette target at 10 yards in 45 seconds. One flyer hit an ear and the other hit the jugular. That was with 357 Sig.

Underwood makes SD ammo designed for the higher velocities. I use it or the Sig Sauer line of ammo in my 357 Sig and Underwood hardcast in my 10mm.

This reminds me of the anti-Glock bandwagon of a few years ago.
 
So, special bullets, special cases, special equipment to load the ammo, special guns

There is nothing special about bullets, cases, dies, reloading presses or guns for .357 SIG, except that they're all 357 SIG. The same could be said of any caliber.

The 357 SIG was designed to do exactly 1 thing - replicate the ballistics of a 125 grain 357 Magnum fired from a 4" service revolver. It does that very well. It isn't a jack of all trades cartridge.

Factory ammo can be had close enough to 9mm as makes no real difference. The only accommodation I make when reloading is to separate bullet seating and crimping.

In case it's not obvious, I'm a fan of the 357 SIG.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top