OP
Nicksterdemus
Member
Thanks Muley. I'll have to find the file, but I seem to recall learning that tidbit on this forum, but that's been a few years ago. Bear in mind that I'm basing that completely on my memory which is always suspect.
After snooping in the book it appears I've confused the 1917 heat treating w/.38 1905 4th change. Heat treating began approximately at SN 316648. Further peeking in my files shines light on my poor memory.
My 4th change is a 255XXX, so it's the one not heat treated, had a brl replacement from around 1946, complete w/different S SN, and it came w/Faux stocks that weren't Ajax, but Jay Scott's.
Not my pistola, not a S&W nor #14 JS stocks though otherwise the same. Maybe cheesy to some, yet on nickel looks good to me. My fit is tight and certainly not oversized on the K frame .38 be it the shiney refinished 1905 HE or 14-4 Combat.
http://i220.photobucket.com/albums/...DC00F71-6557-000006A28E4C1846_zps79130969.jpg
Thanks for pointing out my error as the only thing worse than being wrong/post disinformation is not realizing such!
Other than a S&W R stamp on the 1917 I'll run w/:
Rescript.
It would seem that the R was a S&W stamp or someone mimicking their style of the same three capital letters in the usual suspect/places. Whilst I speculate the R would've been stamped before bluing whether original blue or not. If sent in then repair/refurbish would appear to be the leading candidate.
Possibly a letter would reveal factory work at a later date.
After snooping in the book it appears I've confused the 1917 heat treating w/.38 1905 4th change. Heat treating began approximately at SN 316648. Further peeking in my files shines light on my poor memory.
My 4th change is a 255XXX, so it's the one not heat treated, had a brl replacement from around 1946, complete w/different S SN, and it came w/Faux stocks that weren't Ajax, but Jay Scott's.
Not my pistola, not a S&W nor #14 JS stocks though otherwise the same. Maybe cheesy to some, yet on nickel looks good to me. My fit is tight and certainly not oversized on the K frame .38 be it the shiney refinished 1905 HE or 14-4 Combat.
http://i220.photobucket.com/albums/...DC00F71-6557-000006A28E4C1846_zps79130969.jpg
Thanks for pointing out my error as the only thing worse than being wrong/post disinformation is not realizing such!
Other than a S&W R stamp on the 1917 I'll run w/:
Rescript.
It would seem that the R was a S&W stamp or someone mimicking their style of the same three capital letters in the usual suspect/places. Whilst I speculate the R would've been stamped before bluing whether original blue or not. If sent in then repair/refurbish would appear to be the leading candidate.
Possibly a letter would reveal factory work at a later date.
Last edited: