2 in. SA .38

Books, looks legit for a factory re-barrel to the two inch. The barrel markings are the same as used on the right side of the 2", .32 Safety Hammerless.

Things are never quite always the same when it comes to S&W. Here's my .32 Bicycle Gun with the markings on the LEFT side of the barrel.
 

Attachments

  • bicycle 5.jpg
    bicycle 5.jpg
    109.4 KB · Views: 15
And for what it's worth:

A lettered (1923) 2 inch 5th model .38 Safety Hammerless; with no patent markings at all.

Books
 

Attachments

  • 2in5thND.jpg
    2in5thND.jpg
    60.4 KB · Views: 9
Last edited:
Books, looks legit for a factory re-barrel to the two inch. The barrel markings are the same as used on the right side of the 2", .32 Safety Hammerless. Are there any date marks on the left frame under the stocks? Very neat revolver.

There are no markings on the frame under the stocks at all.


Books
 
There are no markings on the frame under the stocks at all.

I'm voting for a factory re-barrel done after-the-fact. The service records may or may not exist in the S&WHF records that haven't yet been digitized ... but I simply don't see someone else cobbling together a barrel with roll marks like that.

In any event, it's a nice looking piece.

Mike
 
OK, I choked badly. The roll marks are on the LEFT side of the barrel on the 1st Model, .32 Safety Hammerless. Anyone that's been around me knows I have troubles with right and left and this was no different. Anyone need directions to the store???
 
Major Distributor?

Actually,
There is one other possibility. It's also very possible that this person walked into a Major Distributor in Say New York and asked them to put a 2" barrel on it for them. Major Distributors had a huge stock pile of parts for all guns available. they would purchase parts directly from the factory.

The Distributor could have placed the Order for the barrel only with Smith & Wesson some time after 1887 when they were more willing to meet special orders. That would also fit since there is no record of the work done. Perhaps that is what Mr. Jinks was trying to say in the letter.

However, that doesn't answer the question regarding the "matching serial number"....so.... I guess we go back to the question regarding the die stamps on the barrel serial number.....Do they match the die stamps on the rest of the gun? If they do then it's definitely factory....If they don't then it's likely and early Distributor in house job.


Murph
 
Last edited:
Major Distributor Part II

If we look through period catalogs?

As an example these photos taken from The Schoverling, Daily & Gales Major Distributor catalog CIRCA 1892

You can clearly see that they maintained a complete stock of parts for many guns of that period. There are several more pages of shotguns, rifles, and pistols of all makes and models.

Notice they also stocked the rare 8" & 10" barrels available for all 32 and 38 cal SA & DA top breaks as well as the scarce 4" barrel for the DA 44's. So anything is possible from the Major Distributor in New York at that time frame.

They most definitely had qualified on site gunsmiths that could have easily made any alterations requested by a client. From my research they also had indoor ranges For a potential client to actually test fire firearms prior to purchasing.

I would imagine that the parts would have had NO serial number. So, did the Distributor number the part to match? I have no idea.

Murph
 

Attachments

  • 9625DE84-64CD-4C78-846D-950CF53669F7.jpg
    9625DE84-64CD-4C78-846D-950CF53669F7.jpg
    121.8 KB · Views: 12
  • 308C7C7C-2F04-4E4A-A964-FF64FEA7F3CF.jpg
    308C7C7C-2F04-4E4A-A964-FF64FEA7F3CF.jpg
    88 KB · Views: 9
  • DADC0448-008E-4145-BC85-AD24B6DFE656.jpg
    DADC0448-008E-4145-BC85-AD24B6DFE656.jpg
    104.3 KB · Views: 11
  • 8FD11559-E0A7-4CA2-95D0-B2725B9086C7.jpg
    8FD11559-E0A7-4CA2-95D0-B2725B9086C7.jpg
    96.5 KB · Views: 23

Latest posts

Back
Top