Fishinfool
Member
This past weekend, I traveled out to CT. to visit a fellow gun nut buddy. He had picked up a couple new toys in the past several days, and it would be a chance for both of us to try them out.
First up was a NIB Ruger GP-100 in .22 with a 6 inch barrel. The gun looked good, the grips felt fine in my big hands, and it balanced well. Now for the not so good - Machining, especially around the chamber holes and star / ratchet were fresh off the CNC, with no smoothing or polishing, as in sharp enough edges to cut your hand. This might explain why the gun couldn't go thru a full 10 round cylinder.
Tried several brands of good .22 lr ammo, and inevitably, it would become impossible to rotate the cylinder, DA or SA, to fire the last two, sometimes one cartridge. It did not "jam up" consistently on any one or two chambers. Fired cartridge rims seem distorted, which may have contributed to the cycling issues, as well as the difficult extraction. And the SA hammer pull was about the worst I have experienced on a revolver. DA and SA trigger pull seemed just "OK", as was accuracy. Sights were adjustable rear with a fiber optic front and worked well. This gun clearly needs work, and is the first Ruger in my experience that should have never left the factory.
Gun two was a NIB Colt King Cobra, 6 inch, also in .22 rimfire. Very nicely fit and finished, with none of the rough & sharp machining of the Ruger. SA and DA trigger were both very nice, and the difference between the Colt's SA cocking feel / weight and the Rugers were frankly like night and day.
Grips were comfortable, but a little small for my hands. Also a 10 shot gun, the Colt is much thinner and overall smaller than the Ruger, or a model 17 for that matter - It's a petite 6 inch revolver. Balance was good, as was accuracy at 25 yards. No malfunctions or misfires. Ejection was smooth. I really liked it, and may change my mind about getting a 4 inch version.
Beare in mind that the above is just my opinions about two guns I have never shot before, with a sample of only one each.
Oh, and my Smith 18-3 that I brought along was more accurate than either of the above, about as nicely fit and finished as the Colt, with about an equally good DA trigger. The Smiths SA was by far the best feeling. My only complaint with the 18 is it has those tight chambers, which can make loading a pain, especially when dirty.
The above are just some observations I thought I would post while they were fresh in my mind. And this aint a Ruger bashing thing - I own quite a few Rugers, and have been well pleased with them.
Comments and experiences welcome.
Larry
First up was a NIB Ruger GP-100 in .22 with a 6 inch barrel. The gun looked good, the grips felt fine in my big hands, and it balanced well. Now for the not so good - Machining, especially around the chamber holes and star / ratchet were fresh off the CNC, with no smoothing or polishing, as in sharp enough edges to cut your hand. This might explain why the gun couldn't go thru a full 10 round cylinder.
Tried several brands of good .22 lr ammo, and inevitably, it would become impossible to rotate the cylinder, DA or SA, to fire the last two, sometimes one cartridge. It did not "jam up" consistently on any one or two chambers. Fired cartridge rims seem distorted, which may have contributed to the cycling issues, as well as the difficult extraction. And the SA hammer pull was about the worst I have experienced on a revolver. DA and SA trigger pull seemed just "OK", as was accuracy. Sights were adjustable rear with a fiber optic front and worked well. This gun clearly needs work, and is the first Ruger in my experience that should have never left the factory.
Gun two was a NIB Colt King Cobra, 6 inch, also in .22 rimfire. Very nicely fit and finished, with none of the rough & sharp machining of the Ruger. SA and DA trigger were both very nice, and the difference between the Colt's SA cocking feel / weight and the Rugers were frankly like night and day.
Grips were comfortable, but a little small for my hands. Also a 10 shot gun, the Colt is much thinner and overall smaller than the Ruger, or a model 17 for that matter - It's a petite 6 inch revolver. Balance was good, as was accuracy at 25 yards. No malfunctions or misfires. Ejection was smooth. I really liked it, and may change my mind about getting a 4 inch version.
Beare in mind that the above is just my opinions about two guns I have never shot before, with a sample of only one each.
Oh, and my Smith 18-3 that I brought along was more accurate than either of the above, about as nicely fit and finished as the Colt, with about an equally good DA trigger. The Smiths SA was by far the best feeling. My only complaint with the 18 is it has those tight chambers, which can make loading a pain, especially when dirty.
The above are just some observations I thought I would post while they were fresh in my mind. And this aint a Ruger bashing thing - I own quite a few Rugers, and have been well pleased with them.
Comments and experiences welcome.
Larry
Last edited:
