After the 1968 Gun Control Act, for a few years, Dad had to sign a logbook to buy .22 rimfire ammo in Washington State.
We bought it at the (famous) White Elephant Store in Spokane. I remember Dad commenting, "When we gonna get rid of this stupid requirement?" The salesman shrugged and grumbled in agreement.
I believe that by about 1972, signing a logbook was no longer required. And I recall buying .22 rimfire ammo without question, when I was 17.
The Californians began moving to the Pacific Northwest in the 1960s. Carried their virulent "feel good, do nothing" laws with them. I was born and raised in Washington, but would never live there again. They ruined my native state. Shat all over the nest.
Some of the highest gas, tobacco, alcohol and sales taxes in the nation. It used to be easy to get on Welfare in Washington, so that attracted a lot of rifraff from California and the eastern seaboard that significantly raised crime, drugs and welfare fraud.
From what I hear, not so easy to get on Welfare in Washington now, but still not impossible. Third generation rifraff is causing problems now.
Dang shame; it was once a nice, relatively safe state.
Given the above, I doubt the "are you 21?" question will go away. I expect the old logbook to reappear (in electronic form) for signing.
If the anti-gunners can't register the guns, they'll register who buys ammo and reloading components and equipment. It's a backdoor move to find out who owns what.
Registration always, always leads to confiscation. Just ask England, Australia and other nations.
In Australia, you can't even own a pump shotgun, let alone a semi-auto anything! Not even a semi-auto .22 rimfire. Restricted, you know.
Hammer away at your representative, Congress, the Senate and the President about your dissatisfaction. Be civil, but be firm: gun control laws have never worked and never will.
New York's Sullivan Law, banning ownership of handguns without a police approved license, dates to the early 1900s.
Boy, that worked huh?