I have a pair of 642's, both bought at the same time, just under 2 years ago. I carry them both, but one in particular has been in my pocket nearly every day, all day, since I got them. The other sometimes gets pocket duty, but usually, when it's carried, it's in an OWB pancake holster (that one has wood grips, the pocket one has the factory rubber grips). I use a DeSantis Nemesis pocket holster.
The one that rides around in my pocket every day has developed a pretty serious case of clear coat peeling. The backstrap in particular has come off in flakes, and is now entirely bare aluminum.
What's interesting is that the finish on the two guns is not identical (one is a -1 and the other a -2 with the lock). If I were to compare it to varnish, I'd say it feels and looks like the peeling gun (the pocket one) is almost a gloss finish, where the other gun, whose finish is basically perfect and looks like new, is matte.
As an EDC pocket gun, I don't care *that* much that the one is peeling (but it does bother me a little), and with the backstrap fully peeled, you don't even really notice that the finish is gone. Still it gets me wondering if this is an issue with a lot of the 642's. Was the glossy, peeling one done wrong?
I've heard where I could potentially send it back to Smith and Wesson and they'll either refinish it or replace it, but I don't feel like that hassle, and I don't even want it replaced as I've gotten the trigger so nicely broken in that I love the way it shoots. I just don't want it to start corroding, if that's a concern. Finally, I've not gotten any cleaning solvent at all on the aluminum. I've been very careful about that since getting the guns.
The one that rides around in my pocket every day has developed a pretty serious case of clear coat peeling. The backstrap in particular has come off in flakes, and is now entirely bare aluminum.
What's interesting is that the finish on the two guns is not identical (one is a -1 and the other a -2 with the lock). If I were to compare it to varnish, I'd say it feels and looks like the peeling gun (the pocket one) is almost a gloss finish, where the other gun, whose finish is basically perfect and looks like new, is matte.
As an EDC pocket gun, I don't care *that* much that the one is peeling (but it does bother me a little), and with the backstrap fully peeled, you don't even really notice that the finish is gone. Still it gets me wondering if this is an issue with a lot of the 642's. Was the glossy, peeling one done wrong?
I've heard where I could potentially send it back to Smith and Wesson and they'll either refinish it or replace it, but I don't feel like that hassle, and I don't even want it replaced as I've gotten the trigger so nicely broken in that I love the way it shoots. I just don't want it to start corroding, if that's a concern. Finally, I've not gotten any cleaning solvent at all on the aluminum. I've been very careful about that since getting the guns.