There are a lot of reasons to post a new thread on this forum. In this case, I am looking to see if anyone sees things the way I do, regarding the Models 6906 and the 3913.
I purchased a 3913 some time ago, cleaned it up, and put a new recoil spring in it and new OEM grips on it. It is surprisingly accurate and totally reliable, and a pleasure to shoot. This pistol quickly moved up to being one my my all-time favorites.
I then added a 6906 to the collection. This one has a little wear on the outside, but is like new on the inside. I don't know its lineage but I am guessing from its serial number (VCVXXX) it dates to around 1995.
The 6906 is reliable. I had some problems with a new old stock magazine I found on the web, which came in S&W packaging. That magazine has two locking notches in the tube (the others in my possession only have one) and the bottom of the follower would catch in one of the notches, not allowing more than three rounds to be loaded. I fixed this with a little judicious re-shaping of the prongs on the bottom of the follower, but I didn't expect this sort of problem with the mature design of the 6906. But that is a side issue...
I am having some trouble shooting the 6906 accurately, though, with bigger groups than I am used to shooting. The SA trigger break is not as smooth or soft as the 3913, and the pistol feels oddly bulky and top heavy compared to the 3913. There are a number of more "modern" pistols that are roughly the same size that hold more rounds, and the 6906 doesn't seem to fit a niche quite as well as the 3913 (which I reckon is smallish, easily controllable, and accurate -- with a reasonable number of rounds (9) compared to a J frame; to me, the 3913 compares favorably with the P239, another classic with a lot going for it).
So therein lies my question to other 3913/6906 owners: why less joy with the 6906 compared to the 3913? Am I missing something? For two pistols that are really similar -- the top ends of both are pretty much the same -- why do I like one so much more than the other? Anyone else feel this way?
I purchased a 3913 some time ago, cleaned it up, and put a new recoil spring in it and new OEM grips on it. It is surprisingly accurate and totally reliable, and a pleasure to shoot. This pistol quickly moved up to being one my my all-time favorites.
I then added a 6906 to the collection. This one has a little wear on the outside, but is like new on the inside. I don't know its lineage but I am guessing from its serial number (VCVXXX) it dates to around 1995.
The 6906 is reliable. I had some problems with a new old stock magazine I found on the web, which came in S&W packaging. That magazine has two locking notches in the tube (the others in my possession only have one) and the bottom of the follower would catch in one of the notches, not allowing more than three rounds to be loaded. I fixed this with a little judicious re-shaping of the prongs on the bottom of the follower, but I didn't expect this sort of problem with the mature design of the 6906. But that is a side issue...
I am having some trouble shooting the 6906 accurately, though, with bigger groups than I am used to shooting. The SA trigger break is not as smooth or soft as the 3913, and the pistol feels oddly bulky and top heavy compared to the 3913. There are a number of more "modern" pistols that are roughly the same size that hold more rounds, and the 6906 doesn't seem to fit a niche quite as well as the 3913 (which I reckon is smallish, easily controllable, and accurate -- with a reasonable number of rounds (9) compared to a J frame; to me, the 3913 compares favorably with the P239, another classic with a lot going for it).
So therein lies my question to other 3913/6906 owners: why less joy with the 6906 compared to the 3913? Am I missing something? For two pistols that are really similar -- the top ends of both are pretty much the same -- why do I like one so much more than the other? Anyone else feel this way?
Last edited: