Hello All!
In the next few weeks I plan on traveling to a distant match, and carrying en route where my permit is recognized. My intention is to consciously avoid known "hot" spots, but it seems that virtually any area can become a "hot" spot in the blink of an eye. In many respects, this question is more directed towards LEOs and attorneys that have been involved in (either the arrest, investigation, or defense phases of) a self-defense shooting.
Scenario: a person is traveling to a specific destination (in this case a match) and is carrying their EDC, and transporting an additional (target) arm. The individual is ultimately forced to use their EDC to defend themselves. When they are either detained or arrested/released on bail, I realize that the arm that is used for defense will be retained as evidence, but will the additional arm intended for use in a match also be held as evidence or would it be released to the owner?
My follow-up questions are:
1). if any degree of social media can be trusted, how is a traveler that was forced to defend themselves and is released expected to continue to be able to defend themselves? This, in light of the claims that a contract has been placed on Kyle Rittenhouse once he is located in a correctional facility?
2) if a person is forced to defend themselves, while the incident is being investigated, are any arms that they may have at home also seized, or an order shared with the defender's home state seeking seizure of the other arms that they may possess?
Thanks in advance for your help!
In the next few weeks I plan on traveling to a distant match, and carrying en route where my permit is recognized. My intention is to consciously avoid known "hot" spots, but it seems that virtually any area can become a "hot" spot in the blink of an eye. In many respects, this question is more directed towards LEOs and attorneys that have been involved in (either the arrest, investigation, or defense phases of) a self-defense shooting.
Scenario: a person is traveling to a specific destination (in this case a match) and is carrying their EDC, and transporting an additional (target) arm. The individual is ultimately forced to use their EDC to defend themselves. When they are either detained or arrested/released on bail, I realize that the arm that is used for defense will be retained as evidence, but will the additional arm intended for use in a match also be held as evidence or would it be released to the owner?
My follow-up questions are:
1). if any degree of social media can be trusted, how is a traveler that was forced to defend themselves and is released expected to continue to be able to defend themselves? This, in light of the claims that a contract has been placed on Kyle Rittenhouse once he is located in a correctional facility?
2) if a person is forced to defend themselves, while the incident is being investigated, are any arms that they may have at home also seized, or an order shared with the defender's home state seeking seizure of the other arms that they may possess?
Thanks in advance for your help!