American 44 “Rimfire”

Yes,
I stumbled upon the 42 Stenson while researching the early 44 Rimfire Pistol cartridge. Lots of claims out there but the only documentation that I have seen is on very low serial numbered 71 Colt open top revolvers that letter as chambered in 42 Stenson caliber. I know the caliber appeared in 1871 introduced by George Stenson as an improvement to the 44RF Flat.
However, the cartridge seems to have died off very quickly as later serial numbered 44 Opentops actually letter as 44 rimfires. So extremely obscure.
I have a 71 Opentop in poor condition in the 700 serial numbered range but in well enough condition to research the bore and chambers. It clearly mics as a 44 rf Pistol caliber and matches my original 44rf pistol rounds perfectly.
It would also be difficult to identify a legit 42 Stenson round without documentation regarding specs. A very early and short lived cartridge.

MurphIMG_4612.jpeg
 
Yes — what you’re describing does ring bells, especially in the context of Winchester experimental cartridges and 19th-century naming conventions, where nominal caliber designations didn’t always reflect actual bore or groove diameters.
Here’s a breakdown of the .42 Stetson, along with clarification of its .44-caliber connection:

🔍 Winchester .42 Stetson – What It Is

The .42 Stetson is a relatively obscure, experimental cartridge developed by or for Winchester, likely in the 1870s–1880s, as part of efforts to create a repeating rifle with improved range, accuracy, and stopping power. It was designed to work with a repeating rifle action—possibly in early lever-action designs like the Model 1876 or experimental arms.
The Stetson name refers to William Stetson, a Winchester designer and engineer involved in developing proprietary cartridges.

🔧 Caliber Confusion: Why It’s Called “.42”

Your memory is accurate: the .42 Stetson is technically a .44 caliber by modern standards, but here's what likely happened:
  • .42 refers to bore diameter (measured across the lands)
  • .44 refers to groove diameter (measured across the grooves)
This difference is common in 19th-century cartridges. For example:
  • The .38 Special uses a .357-inch bullet
    The .44 Russian, .44 S&W American, and others use bullets of .429–.431 inches
The .42 Stetson may have used a .429–.431 diameter bullet, making it a .44-caliber projectile, but had a bore (across the lands) of around .42 inches, hence the name.

📌 Why It Matters​

This naming method wasn’t standardized, and manufacturers often labeled cartridges for marketing or design purposes, not strict measurement. The .42 Stetson likely followed that logic.
If you’re trying to match or understand the actual bullet or bore size:
  • Groove diameter = ~.44 caliber → bullet size
  • Bore (land) diameter = ~.42 → name origin


📚 Not Much Survives on the .42 Stetson​

It's not widely documented, but references show up in:

Old Winchester experimental cartridge lists
The Winchester Cartridge Board displays
Some Herter’s or Barnes books on obsolete and wildcat cartridges



✅ Summary​

FeatureValue
Name.42 Stetson
True Caliber~.44 groove diameter
Bore Diameter~.42 (across the lands)
Bullet DiameterLikely ~.429–.431 inches
EraLate 19th century
PurposeExperimental rifle cartridge (likely repeater-compatible)
DesignerWilliam Stetson (Winchester)


If anyone sees an issue with this post please let us know. There is a Pasadena Tx gun show today May 31-June 1, might head over their and check it out.


Here is a revolver that was auctioned off on invaluable. Expensive Sold for over $20K.
Documented Early Colt Model 1871-1872 Open Top Single Action Revolver Factory Recorded in Extremely Rare .42 Stetson Caliber with Factory Letter An estimated 7,000 Colt "Open Top" revolvers were manufactured in 1872-73. They are the ancestors of the Colt percussion and conversion revolvers and the direct predecessors of the famous Colt Single Action Army revolvers. Many of these rare revolvers saw very hard use or have been destroyed. Offered here is an early three digit serial numbered example which is listed by the factory records as being in .42 Stetson caliber. The accompanying factory letter lists this Open Top with a barrel chambered in ".42 for Stetson cartridge" when it was shipped to Spies, Kissam & Co., New York City as part of a 20 gun shipment on July 18, 1872. This letter is also reprinted and discussed in R. Bruce McDowell's "A Study of Colt Conversions and Other Percussion Revolvers" on page 280. In 1871, George R. Stetson received a patent for his cartridge that became known as the .42 Stetson because the bullet diameter was .42 inches. Stetson cartridge was essentially an improved version of the .44 Henry flat rimfire. The .44 caliber and .42 caliber can use the same rifled barrel bore because the .42 Stetson has a groove-to-groove dimension of .44 inches. As explained by McDowell, Colt was simultaneously producing the Open Top and Richards-Mason revolvers and required proper terminology to identify the two revolvers in their records. The result was that the Richards-Mason revolver was listed in .44 caliber and the Open Top was listed in .42 caliber. The top of the barrel has the one-line New York address, and the frame has the correct early production "COLTS/PATENT" marking seen on roughly the first 1,000 revolvers. The cylinder has the naval battle scene. Matching full serial numbers are found on the frame, barrel, both grip straps, and cylinder. Fitted with the short Navy type grip. Includes consignor research. Manufacturer: Colt Model: 1871 1872 BBL: 7 1/2 inch round Stock: Gauge: 42 Stetson Finish: blue/casehardened/silver Grips: walnut Serial Number: 127 Class: Antique Condition: Exceptionally fine. The barrel retains 60% bright original high polish blue finish and the cylinder retains 25% of original blue finish with the balance a mottled brown-gray patina. 30% of original case colors remain on the hammer and frame. There are some patches of deep pitting. 90% of the cylinder scene remains. The grip straps retain 85% original silver plating. There are a few patches of deep pitting. The grip is very fine with a small chip missing near the bottom (right side), some scattered minor pressure dents and scratches and retaining most of the original varnish. Mechanically excellent.

Ill bet classicguns in Houston Tx has the manuals on this and might even have the revolver.
 

Attachments

  • American Heritage Cartridge Poster_.jpg
    American Heritage Cartridge Poster_.jpg
    326.1 KB · Views: 1
  • Standard-Obsolete-Big-Bore-bp.jpg
    Standard-Obsolete-Big-Bore-bp.jpg
    404.9 KB · Views: 1
  • Small Bore.jpg
    Small Bore.jpg
    333.8 KB · Views: 0
  • Medium Bore.jpg
    Medium Bore.jpg
    336.5 KB · Views: 0
  • Micro & Small Bore (proprieary & wildcat).jpg
    Micro & Small Bore (proprieary & wildcat).jpg
    356.4 KB · Views: 0
Conversion

I found a photo of what I’ve seen several times to convert an original 44 Rimfire Short “Pistol” chamber to also shoot the 44 American centerfire round. This conversion would not work with any other round but the American 44cf. This conversion has been seen and documented in published books.

Also, this conversion would not work if the chambers were originally machined to shoot the Henry Flat rifle round since the 44 American mimics the 44 Rimfire Pistol round in case dynamics.
A Henry chamber would cause the 44 American centerfire to bulge and split with discharge which would not be safe to shoot.

Murph
I recently looked at a Colt SAA RF Henry with that Firing pin arrangement and was told and shown in a book that there was a Centerfire Henry round which enabled the Colt to fire both cartridges.
 
Yes,
I stumbled upon the 42 Stenson while researching the early 44 Rimfire Pistol cartridge. Lots of claims out there but the only documentation that I have seen is on very low serial numbered 71 Colt open top revolvers that letter as chambered in 42 Stenson caliber. I know the caliber appeared in 1871 introduced by George Stenson as an improvement to the 44RF Flat.
However, the cartridge seems to have died off very quickly as later serial numbered 44 Opentops actually letter as 44 rimfires. So extremely obscure.
I have a 71 Opentop in poor condition in the 700 serial numbered range but in well enough condition to research the bore and chambers. It clearly mics as a 44 rf Pistol caliber and matches my original 44rf pistol rounds perfectly.
It would also be difficult to identify a legit 42 Stenson round without documentation regarding specs. A very early and short lived cartridge.

MurphView attachment 762931
Very cool, that is quite a collection.
 
From Donnelly "The Handloader's Manual of Cartridge Conversions". Might prove helpful.
 

Attachments

  • .38 S&W.jpg
    .38 S&W.jpg
    197.8 KB · Views: 0
  • .44 colt.jpg
    .44 colt.jpg
    275.6 KB · Views: 0
  • .44 evan short.jpg
    .44 evan short.jpg
    430.6 KB · Views: 0
  • .44 henry.jpg
    .44 henry.jpg
    281.5 KB · Views: 0
  • .44 american.jpg
    .44 american.jpg
    277.8 KB · Views: 1
  • .44 russian.jpg
    .44 russian.jpg
    283.6 KB · Views: 0
What an interesting discussion. I personally have no interest in the 44 RF, but learned a lot from following this thread.
Thank you all.
I don't own any 44 RFs, I do own a Model 1 1/2 2nd issue that my wife's Great Grandfather carried with while in Russia in 1918-19 with a YMCA group, Volga River Expedition.
 
Last edited:
Hi There,

The number of rimfire cartridges available just after the end of the
Civil War was staggering. This was a period of time where a Military
Industrial Complex was faced with the end of their market. So they
quickly changed to appeal to the civilian market. This was a time of
rapid attrition in the firearms industry and many of the firearms man-
ufacturers that were working at full capacity during The War couldn't
stay profitable and went bankrupt in the next ten years after the Civil
War. Companies like, Spencer, Sharps, Starr, Whitney and many others
I cannot recall at this moment. Most were purchased by the other
industrialists that were connected to the firearms industry (like Marcellus
Hartley).

If one is going to post reloading data for "obsolete" cartridges, one must
realize that some of this data is derived from surviving examples and
there was some variations between manufacturers as to the dimensions
of cartridges. I have pulled down several rounds of .44 S&W American.
One Winchester and a couple of UMC rounds. The recorded cartridge
case length for this caliber is .880" but the UMC rounds have cases .875"
long and the Winchester made round has a case length of .895". As one
can see, these early designed cartridges did have variance in their dimen-
sions. If you want to learn about making ammo for an obsolete firearms,
you might want to consult an older reference on the topic. The Home
Guide to Cartridge Conversions by George Nonte, Jr. 1961 & 1967
Is a good reference on the subject.

Getting back to the original purpose of this thread, the .44 RF Henry round
was loaded with two different powder charges. If the rounds are intended
to be used in a rifle only, the .44 Henry was loaded with 26gr. of powder.
If the intended use was in both rifle and revolver, the powder charge was
only 23gr. This information is known because the Ottoman Empire, which
purchased thousands of Winchester "Improved Henry's" and cartridges for
them, also purchased revolvers from S&W in the same caliber. They com-
plained about the difficulty of revolving the cylinder because of the swelling
of the cartridge head when used in their revolvers.

D. Wesson wrote to the Ottoman Empire and said the cause of the problem
was a "defect" in the way the cartridge was manufactured. The "H" headstamp
would swell out more and cause the problem. This letter was leaked back to
the Winchester Repeating Arms Co. and D. Wesson received a stern letter
from them explaining that the rounds sold to Turkey were the 26gr. rifle only
rounds and were not made for use in a revolver. They closed with a stern
request that if S&W finds any fault with their (Winchester) products, to report
it directly to Winchester first.

Cheers!
Webb
 
Back
Top