Ammo Question for my 442

jeremy1517

Member
Joined
Jun 22, 2009
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
My S&W 442 is capable of shooting 38 +P but my question is should I shoot +P or stick with a good 38 load? The gunsmiths at my shooting range recommended not shooting the +P load because they said there was too much recoil for the light gun and it will ultimately harm the barrel. I practice with 38 loads so I wouldn't be shooting +P very often. I shoot Hornady Critical defense ammo for my carry loads. What do you all think?
 
Register to hide this ad
It won't harm your barrel. +P, if it does anything, it will open the gap at the cylinder and cone theoretically. Realistically, unless you put thousands of rounds downrange, it will be fine.
 
I think you are on the right track. Standard velocity stuff for routine practice, which is when we do the vast majority of our shooting, and +P for defensive use.

Even if you burn up your defensive ammo once per year and buy fresh stuff, you won't be doing any harm to your revolver and it should last just as long (or longer) than you'll ever need it.
 
I use the old FBI load in mine, just picked up a 250 round box of Speer 135gr Gold Dot +Ps to try in the snubbys and will not worry about useing them in my 442 if they work out.
 
Like said above, there is no problem feeding your M442 a steady diet of +P ammo. I also suggest using the FBI Load, Speer 135gr Short barrel ammo and I'll add one, Hornady Critical Defense ammo. For practice use the least expensive standard pressure ammo you can find. Finish up the practice session with a cylinder or two of your carry ammo.

I carry a Airweight J frame and that's what I do... (although I load my practice ammo)
 
No offense to your gunsmiths at the shooting range,
but most of them are like the Gander Mtn. type "gunsmith"
who really only reblue and change parts. Their true practical
knowledge of smithing, mechanics, and ammunition
in my experience of them have been rather limited.
I once had a "gunsmith" at Gander Mtn. send my
1950s vintage S&W 19 flying down a metal table
because he was messing around with something else
and acted like he didn't know what he had when he hit it with another gun box. He then offered me $125 bucks for it at 80% condition and I flat out asked him if he knew what he had and what he was doing-
he didn't.

To answer your question about ammo, lead bullets wear the barrel
less than a jacketed bullet. +P will generally increase wear,
we are talking many, many thousands of rounds. Most of us don't shoot our snubs that much to hurt them. Mine eats +P+ too.

+P is not that hot. Period. I practice with +P in my J frame simply because I believe in shooting with what I carry. It is still tight and
to answer the next question it is not "+P rated." Being rated for it does not mean much. Smith and Wesson says you can shoot +p in any model numbered K frame. That is not beacuse a 1955 pre Model 10 M&P is weaker than a 1958 Model 10, it is CYA by S&W because unless the general public can read a model number they won't be able to differentiate between a 1910 M&P and a 1960 M&P with a number.
Same goes for the J frames- ANY 38 ammo on the shelf now will not hurt a J Frame Smith.

S&W used to sell their own brand of ammo that could be used in any of their guns. I have shot some of their hollowpoint loads in my J and let me tell you they make modern 38+P feel like wadcutters. They were hot to say the least. Also, Elmer Keith put 500 rounds of 38-44 (near 357 loads, 158 LRN at 1100FPS) through a first year prod. J frame with no damage at all. +P of today is nothing to worry about in your J Frame.

Just my 2 cents, but your "P rated" J frame will outlast you with general maintenance even if you shot only +P. Many S&W revolvers out there have 50k rounds through them and are still good.
 
I too carry a 442. I like to take the less expensive standard pressure loads to the range. But for carry ammo I'm gonna have to agree with Kanewpadle & say Cor Bon DPX is where it's at as far as carry ammo....in all my guns! I'm sure if it was "bad" to shoot the +P loads in it Smith & Wesson wouldn't have wasted their time engraving it on the barrel.
 
Last edited:

Latest posts

Back
Top