I do not like dwelling on mistakes of the past. However, when I shoot my full size .40 S&W pistol, and especially when I compare the price of .40 S&W to 9 mm ammo, I think that as a shooter it would have made more sense to get the 9 mm.
I fully understand that a police officer or soldier might want the extra oomph of the .40 S&W. But as a range toy, it would seem that the 9 mm is superior in many ways -- i.e., recoil, noise, price.
I wonder what influenced me to get the .40 S&W?
ADDED NOTE: This is not about the relative superiority of 9 mm and .40 S&W. Rather, I am wondering if anyone else has had a similar regret and if they have an explanation for why they got the .40
I fully understand that a police officer or soldier might want the extra oomph of the .40 S&W. But as a range toy, it would seem that the 9 mm is superior in many ways -- i.e., recoil, noise, price.
I wonder what influenced me to get the .40 S&W?
ADDED NOTE: This is not about the relative superiority of 9 mm and .40 S&W. Rather, I am wondering if anyone else has had a similar regret and if they have an explanation for why they got the .40
Last edited: