A squib we had one time in a 1911 left the bullet protruding from the end of the barrel. It cycled the slide just enough to partially eject the case giving it the chance to turn around and rechamber backwards. We don't know if it was a low or a no powder squib.
That being said, when fire lapping a barrel it is common to load the rounds with just enough powder to get the bullet out of the barrel.
Anyone Ever Intentionally Made A Squib?
Good Lord, no!
What you suggest, sir, is against reason.
Everything I have done over the last 38 years, including written reloading procedures that require three separate checks for a uniform powder load in the cases and a written checklist that accompanies each batch of cartridges, is directed AGAINST the creation of a squib load.
The only place I could see such loads being intentionally created is a training facility where identification of and proper response to a squib is taught as part of the curriculum. But since I have no involvement with such a training program, the whole idea is anathema to me.
Why would anyone intentionally produce a squib load?
On another board someone posted how they had their first squib. The uber-scary part from my perspective: The primer cycled the (Glock) action. The guy didn't have the chance to pull the trigger on the follow-on round - because the bullet didn't make it past the chamber and so it didn't go into battery.
The primer cycling the action is my nightmare scenario. If I was in a slow fire scenario (which is 99.9% of the pistol shooting I do) I know I would hold up and not just pull the trigger. But if I was practicing rapid fire - that's where I'm more unsure. If one is focused on staying on target and laying out 6 fast shots - would you have the presence of mind to stop that fast?)
I have 2 semis - a Walther PPQ and a Browning Hi Power. Given this story I'm considering making a couple of squibs on purpose - and seeing how the guns handle them. Has anyone done this? I know I'd have to pound out a bullet each time. But as far as I can tell the only "damage" would be dealing with a PITA event - as long as the bullet removal goes well. (I've heard do NOT use a wood dowel - because it splinters and the splinters get wedged between the bullet and barrel....making bullet removal even tougher.
Thoughts? Experiences?
Thanks.
OR
I am fascinated that this topic generated so much discussion. I wonder if the scientists and engineers on the Manhattan Project did the same thing????