You guys are missing it. You are crediting the bullet with torque, or spin of it's own. If it had it's own spin, then yes, it would pull the barrel back into itself and tighten the barrel.
However, the bullet has no force or torque of it's own, and therefore when the bullet is forced down the bore, the walls of the bore acts as a drag. This drag causes resistance to the movement of the bullet, creating torque in the direction of the rifling, which makes the barrel want to unscrew.
The truck analogy is inaccurate because the transmisission parking pawl holds the gears from turning while in park. This is what causes the engine to want to rotate in the opposite direction. When in gear, that same torque is put to work rotating the wheels. Yes, the engine will still want to torque away from the direction of rotation under acceleration simply because the mass of the truck is much greater than the mass of the engine itself.
However, the bullet has no force or torque of it's own, and therefore when the bullet is forced down the bore, the walls of the bore acts as a drag. This drag causes resistance to the movement of the bullet, creating torque in the direction of the rifling, which makes the barrel want to unscrew.
The truck analogy is inaccurate because the transmisission parking pawl holds the gears from turning while in park. This is what causes the engine to want to rotate in the opposite direction. When in gear, that same torque is put to work rotating the wheels. Yes, the engine will still want to torque away from the direction of rotation under acceleration simply because the mass of the truck is much greater than the mass of the engine itself.