TexasArmed
Member
Sure it is. From the Revised Code of Washington:
So if a store owner posts a sign saying, "No Guns" or words to that effect and you enter with your gun, you are complying with the conditions for access to said store. Consquently, you would have no defense to a charge of Criminal Trespass in the Second Degree.
The difference between your state and other states is that the other states specifically mention firearms and signs in their laws.
I was just at a gunshop today buying another pocket holster. Sign outside said guns must be unloaded but no 30.06 legal sign. I made my purchase, notified the clerk that I needed to test the pocket holster and did so. Their sign is not a legally enforceable sign.
Attempts, in Texas by a property owner, to unlawfully detain someone can result in that property owner being charged with kidnapping. The property owner may not decide what sign is legal as it is defined in the Texas statutes. If he tells the customer to leave, the customer must leave, but the property owner has no right to detain that person. On a previous occasion however, when they learned that I bought 4 handguns in the past two years, but not at their store, one of them told me that sign applies to people coming in to pawn their guns. Now in Texas, if he had wanted to he could ask me to leave, and I would have been required to do so. But that applies to anyone, gun or no handgun.
Attempting to restrain someone is like me blocking a vehicle in to a handicapped spot because they don't have a handicapped decal. I might want to do that, but doing so might result in me being charged with unlawful detainment.
Property owners, often have biting dogs, That is fine, as long as their dog stays on their property, but if I am in the street and the dog attempts to bite me I would shoot it. These same property owners do not want to pay 6 months of wound care, for my treatment, (diabetic), and the taxpayers of Texas would not appreceiate paying for it either, I want burden the VA with my treatment in such a case and I want pay it so its one or the other. Recently one told me that a good way to get killed is shooting someones dog. I told him someone shoots at me I don't usually miss and I shoot back. The right of that property owner ends where my leg begins if am in the street. The property owners rights do not extend to any part of my leg.
Last edited: