Chronograph - worth the cost?

I have owned the very same unit you are considering for over 12 years now and with the exception of having to replace the sky screens once as are prone to cracking from constatntly taking them apart and putting them back together . It has been a decent tool as long as you stay within its operating ranges with respect to light and shadows as stated in the manual . I could not have developed the loads for the mumerous firearms I have loaded for over the years with the results I was able to obtain without it . It can tell you so much about loads as you work them up that you otherwise would only be making calculated adjustments based on bullet groups alone .

some of the things it will help you cypher is the differences that effect consistant performance such as primers, amount of crimp , lead alloys of different hardness in a given bullet , the lubes associated with cast bullets , when pressures start to exceede the limits of a lead alloy in cast bullets , performance difference at different temperature extremes with a given powder just to name a few .

For those who consider using bullets that are moly coated a chrony is a definite necessity as pressures are reduced using moly and the chrony will take you back to acceptable pressure levels based on your velocity results .

All bullets be they jacketed, hollow pointed or cast have an optimum performance range in relation to velocity . As all firearms tend to shoot a given load with varying results insofar as velocity goes a chrony here is invaluable . Posted speeds in all loading manuals come as a refferance only and only give you a general idea of potential velocities obtained with the VERY SPECIFIC test equipment as well as the bullet they used in their load workup . Many have been the times I worked up a load using the same components as well as barrel length and twist rate to have my loads vary by as much as 200 fps ( usually slower ) and fall low or under velocity needed for proper hollowpoint performance in pistol loads . Without a chrony I would never have known . Changing powders most often found the performance I was looking for but here again I never would have known were it not for the chrony . The reverse would be true of over driving hunting bullets in rifles where the bullets would tend to come apart and not retain enough of the bullet weight to do a good job . Faster isnt always better and again the chrony is a good tool to have on hand to help you work though this without having to shoot up so much of those hard to come by components .

10 Spot
 
After reading these and other comments

I don't doubt the value of chronographs to reloaders, but I'm really wary of the reviews I read. It seems they are a 50/50 propositioons. For every person that says they are the cat's meow, there is somebody saying that they don't work.

Two factors are that today instructions are terrible and many people don't read them anyway.
 
Last edited:
I have the Chrony Master Alpha and the only problems I have encountered are shooting to fast (auto) - takes a few seconds between shoots & as others have reported, the plastic sun screens have a tendency to crack/break from all the bending.
Mine has had no problems reading my pistol or rifle shots (provided I shot the autos a bit slower).
I like mine and would easily recommend Chrony as a good buy.
 
There is no excuse to not own one. Do not allow anyone at the range to "try out" their ammo on it!

My rule for that is simple. I'll chrono your rounds in your gun for you...but I get to shoot at least one at paper (not over the chrony) first to make sure where the gun hits.
 
Chronographs are very useful for reloading.

Just don't make the mistake I did in buying a Pact Professional XP chronograph. It is the piece of trash that I measure other trash by.
 
When I started reloading I wanted "HOT & FAST"..........

45 years later I want to find plinkers and minimum loads.

You can't develop a 12Ga. 7/8oz load at only 1150fps
a 38 spl. 125gr lead bullet X-Lite target load at 582fps
with only 1.98 ft/lbs of recoil, lighter than a std. 148 wad cutter.......
or a little 100gr out of a 30-06 that hits 1600 fps that an 9 year old
can use to shoot 50 yard targets.

These loads are not in loading manuals.

I may use it but mostly so my family and grandchildren can also enjoy shooting.
 
Some people swear by them. Others swear at them. Others have been loading successfully for years without them, working up each load for maximum accuracy. I've had two chrono's and ended up selling them both and going back to my old tried and true methods since I don't change loads once developed for accuracy and used in the field.
 
When I started reloading I wanted "HOT & FAST"..........

45 years later I want to find plinkers and minimum loads.

You can't develop a 12Ga. 7/8oz load at only 1150fps
a 38 spl. 125gr lead bullet X-Lite target load at 582fps
with only 1.98 ft/lbs of recoil, lighter than a std. 148 wad cutter.......
or a little 100gr out of a 30-06 that hits 1600 fps that an 9 year old
can use to shoot 50 yard targets.

These loads are not in loading manuals.

I may use it but mostly so my family and grandchildren can also enjoy shooting.

I see someone else thinks like I do.
 
I shoot in ICORE competitions. I needed to know if my loads would make the power factor. The $100 or so I spent on a chronograph was paid back to me in peace of mind. I now know just what my loads are doing in my guns.

I also think it adds to the reloading hobby in a fun way. It's really nice to see the actual results instead of just guessing using someone's data.
 
There is no excuse to not own one. Do not allow anyone at the range to "try out" their ammo on it!

My rule for that is simple. I'll chrono your rounds in your gun for you...but I get to shoot at least one at paper (not over the chrony) first to make sure where the gun hits.

The absolute BEST advice given in this whole thread!!!
 
Back
Top