Whit
Member
First off, I recognize that any comparisons are highly subjective. We each bring our own set of biases to the table and judge things through those biases. That said, we all have something valid to bring to the discussion. So I value all the view points given but reserve the right to respectfully disagree. Disclaimers out of the way, give me your opinions and observations.
Two of the major players in the gun pouch industry are Kramer and Milt Sparks. I own examples of both. But I don’t own examples of both that can be compared apples to apples.
My question is about specific holsters that are very similar by each maker. Please compare the Sparks 55BN to the Kramer Belt Slide. They are similar in appearance. Both can be had in horse hide. But what are the subtle nuances that set them apart or make one just slightly better than the other? For the sake of comparison, let say using either of them for a Commander sized 1911. Which is your favorite and why? School me in the two holsters so I can make an informed decision on which might be better for me. Thank you kindly.
Two of the major players in the gun pouch industry are Kramer and Milt Sparks. I own examples of both. But I don’t own examples of both that can be compared apples to apples.
My question is about specific holsters that are very similar by each maker. Please compare the Sparks 55BN to the Kramer Belt Slide. They are similar in appearance. Both can be had in horse hide. But what are the subtle nuances that set them apart or make one just slightly better than the other? For the sake of comparison, let say using either of them for a Commander sized 1911. Which is your favorite and why? School me in the two holsters so I can make an informed decision on which might be better for me. Thank you kindly.