Confiscation after a shooting?

Depends on jurisdiction, unfortunately. In Cleveland, Ohio, Cuyahoga County the weapon is/was held until all appeals, criminal and civil, are exhausted. If you want it back, file an "Order of Replevin" and fight through that. Of course, the cost will equal 3 or 4 custom Les Baer 1911s. That is why I have a box of J-frames and Glocks. Things may be changing as at least one person recently challenged the City of Cleveland on this policy and won. They got their gun back but it cost them.

Law trumps policy. When it doesn't, it's because people let themselves be bullied. Bullies NEVER stop being bullies because they get what they want by BEING bullies.
 
I would work with the assumption: yes.

For that reason I would not use an irreplaceable firearm as EDC.

In reality it depends on your zip code, the local court/police policy, whether the gun is held as evidence, in a clean shoot you SHOULD eventually get it back, or your heirs should. I know of folks who wouldn't spend $300 to get thier $200 gun back, I would just on principle.


Self-defense is not a crime. I know of nowhere in the USA, including the totalitarian state of CA, that will not return your weapon that was use in protection of your life or the lives of others.
 
Self-defense is not a crime. I know of nowhere in the USA, including the totalitarian state of CA, that will not return your weapon that was use in protection of your life or the lives of others.

Step over to Sigforum and ask for "ReplacementTommel". He was arrested and lost a C&S worked over BHP when he was accosted by a knife wielding street person in Philadelphia a few years back.
 
So if someone is pulled over for drunk driving, is the car impounded? and if they plead/convicted is the car then destroyed? cars can be used to kill people also!
*
While it won't be destroyed, in Washington, a vehicle used in a DUI offense by a person with at least one prior may in fact be seized and forfeited by judicial process. See RCW 46.61.5058. I just did a bunch of work on this issue for my (LE agency) client; researched the process, developed the paperwork, etc. Firearms do not have to be destroyed here, but after certain offenses can be forfeited and sold. See RCW 9.41.098. If our criminal division DPAs forgot to do that paperwork at resolution, I clean it up for the client so the agency is not stuck with the guns sitting in evidence forever.

BTW, unless the data has shifted a lot, impaired driving collisions are the single most common form of criminal homicide in the US.
 
That was my immediate thought. If you're worried about losing it if you use it, then why bother to carry in the first place?

That has been my thought too, along with others that I shouldn't share. This has been an enlightening thread with first hand knowledge from the LEO folks. I'm not really surprised over the info. I suspected as much.
 
Even LEO's that are involved in a shooting have their gun held as part of the case evidence...

Different zip codes, different laws, different policies. Where I worked if an officer fired his weapon it was taken, examined (to ensure it had issued ammo, was unmodified and in good mechanical order) test fired and returned before the officer was finished filling out paperwork, giving interviews, and seeing the department mandated mental health professional.

Of course the officer was being paid to NOT do his job while he waited to be cleared. As a private citizen there is no impetus to expedite the process.
 
TomkinsSP;139926400 As a private citizen there is no impetus to expedite the process.[/QUOTE said:
There should be. Since there isn't any impetus to expedite the process it leads me to believe "they" are a little badge heavy and "they" are exempt from the rules. Larry
 
These types of questions, made apparent by the answers, shows every jurisdiction and based upon the events will be different. All I can add is I unfortunately had a shooting at work many years ago. My weapon was taken as evidence. Since I had carried it for a few years and it had saved my *** I asked if I could get it back after all was said and done. New pistol issued and eventually back to work. Fast forward a few years after the wrongful death time limitations past. I asked up the chain asking for my pistol. Several blank stares and emails, I picked it up from the property room, signed the form, and was happy to have it back. No marks or numbers etched into it, just as the last time I saw it. A few years later we transitioned to .40's and I was able to buy it back. Moral of story...even on the inside you gotta do leg work
 
If you are either not charged or exonerated after being charged, you'll get it back, provided you remain otherwise eligible to receive a firearm. Around here, after a case in which a gun was seized is concluded or refused, the county prosecutor will notify the seizing agency whether or not the gun is able to be returned to the owner. It helps if you actually go to the department after the conclusion of the case and ask for it, because release of evidence isn't a high priority. Lots of other things to do . . .

Exactly how it works in our little corner of rural OK. I work for the local prosecutor and have facilitated the return of a lot of weapons over the years. Unfortunately, its a pain in the tail for citizens and for the agencies involved. Mostly because caseload far exceeds staffing levels and therefore a low priority task. Our police department has a full time evidence custodian, but he doesn't make a move on returning evidence till he he hears from the prosecutor's office. Most of the other rural agencies have tasked evidence to some already pretty busy deputy or officer. So, even if they have heard from the prosecutor, they get around to it when they get to it.

Not really fair I know. But it is a fact of life in rural places for sure. I guess the short answer to, "will I get my gun back?", is yea, probably, some day. YMMV
 
There should be. Since there isn't any impetus to expedite the process it leads me to believe "they" are a little badge heavy and "they" are exempt from the rules. Larry

IMHO (full disclosure I was a cop for 22+years) the delay comes from the State's Attorney Office. And they ARE the law. The PD just keeps it in evidence until the DA asks for it (theoretically for trial, although I have never personally heard of a legally possessed or used in self defense gun being actually entered as evidence) or the DA agrees to release it to its owner (or it becomes abandoned or 'lost').
 
(or it becomes abandoned or 'lost').

That seems to happen quite a bit. It seems in my state a lot of out going sheriffs end up with very nice gun collections pretty quickly. Not from shootings, but just confiscated guns. One city policeman told me he was well aware of quite a few that became "lost", including a cheapo 25 automatic that ended up at his house rather than being turned in.
 
Self-defense is not a crime. I know of nowhere in the USA, including the totalitarian state of CA, that will not return your weapon that was use in protection of your life or the lives of others.

Step over to Sigforum and ask for "ReplacementTommel". He was arrested and lost a C&S worked over BHP when he was accosted by a knife wielding street person in Philadelphia a few years back.
When I lived in Pennsylvania, north of philly 40 miles, I know of a friend threatened and the system turned it around on him because he was the one who had a legally carried pistol.
Although he was found guilty of a traffic violation (other charges dismissed), his seized pistol was not returned. After he asked for it back, the evidence officer stated that it had to be a request from a judge, and a request done by a lawyer, so the cost involved was not worth it. Had he asked the judge in person for any property seized to be returned, I would imagine he would have gotten it back. However, stirring the pot seemed more dangerous than asking at that moment....
 
Last edited:
Warning : The following comment may contain graphic description of events that may cause some readers pain, facial contortions or other physical experiences.

It was the policy and procedure of the Chicago Police Department up until the late 90's or early 2000 for an officer inventorying a recovered firearm to " permanently etch the officer's initials and star number on the firearm into the metal" . This was heartbreaking at times when it involved an obviously pristine or collector grade gun.

Many officers used to do this in order to positively identify firearms. Every time I saw it done, I'd get the dry heaves.
 
Many officers used to do this in order to positively identify firearms. Every time I saw it done, I'd get the dry heaves.

It's how we were trained, but not how I normally did it. When there was a factory applied serial number, it went in my report and on the evidence tag.* When the factory number was defaced or had never been there I followed the instructions. Defaced #: it isn't going anywhere, anyway. No original number: I was discrete.

A man shot his wife/cohab (forget which) TWICE in (non-vital parts of) the chest with a Winchester .30-30 lever action during an LSD induced hallucination involving Martians coming out of the toilet. He claimed accidental discharge and she backed him up. Went clear to trial and resulted in my certification as an expert witness in order to demonstrate to the jury that whether or not a single AD had occurred, a deliberate action on his part was required before the second shot was fired. In that case, while there was no question as to whether that rifle fired the shots, it was still needed as evidence.

He was convicted. She demanded the rifle back. Although it looked like 40 miles of rough road, the SN placed it in the first few years of production and had belonged to her grandfather. Eventually, when the appeal window had closed, I convinced the DA to release it to her father (the actual owner). She waited for him to complete his sentence and they all lived happily ever after.
 
Last edited:
Exactly how it works in our little corner of rural OK. I work for the local prosecutor and have facilitated the return of a lot of weapons over the years. Unfortunately, its a pain in the tail for citizens and for the agencies involved. Mostly because caseload far exceeds staffing levels and therefore a low priority task. Our police department has a full time evidence custodian, but he doesn't make a move on returning evidence till he he hears from the prosecutor's office. Most of the other rural agencies have tasked evidence to some already pretty busy deputy or officer. So, even if they have heard from the prosecutor, they get around to it when they get to it.

Not really fair I know. But it is a fact of life in rural places for sure. I guess the short answer to, "will I get my gun back?", is yea, probably, some day. YMMV

I gues police work is the same the world over. Back in Feb '12 I tore my rotator cuff on duty. After surgery and a suitable period of rehab I returned to work on light duties pending a full medical clearance. One of the tasks I was given was to go through the property seized in a homicide enquiry that had concluded over 2 years prior. There was some property I had to destroy and some I had to return. Amoung it all was a nice shotgun, I can't remember the make now, that had belonged to the victim and had been stored in a 20' container in the car park used for overflow storage instead of in the gun room. It was covered in rust. I spent half a day with some solvent, oil and a brass pot scrubber cleaning it up before arranging to return it to a relative.
 
Self-defense is not a crime. I know of nowhere in the USA, including the totalitarian state of CA, that will not return your weapon that was use in protection of your life or the lives of others.

In the below case, not even used in any shooting, contested or otherwise . . .

Wright v. Beck - USDC-CD Cal (LAPD firearms retention policy) - Calguns.net

It's pretty much impossible for me to provide a TLDR summary of the above 130 post thread, so I'll just copy the first post of the thread linked above:

On behalf of war veteran and former police officer Wayne Wright, our office filed a federal lawsuit in Los Angeles on Friday against the LAPD, the Los Angeles City Attorney's office, and involved employees and policymakers who conspired to destroy Mr. Wright's firearm collection. Mr. Wright's firearm collection was seized by LAPD in 2004 after he was entrapped by them into allowing one of their undercover detectives to carry a firearm that was being transported to an FFL for a lawful transfer. LAPD then used this bad arrest to get a warrant to seize the entirety of Mr. Wright's collection, some 400-plus firearms comprised primarily of curio and relic pieces.

After Mr. Wright became eligible for the return of his firearms, LAPD's notorious Gun Unit and the City Attorney's office put Mr. Wright through a five-year odyssey of illegal requirements to "prove" he owned the guns they seized from him in order to purportedly gain their return. While LAPD represented to Mr. Wright that his firearms would eventually be returned if he complied with LAPD's unlawful requests for proof of ownership, the City Attorney's office surreptitiously applied for an ex parte order to destroy the collection, and the LAPD then did so without any notice to Mr. Wright.

LAPD has been previously sued for its failure to provide basic due process or follow state law when it comes to returning firearms to their owners. In that prior matter, Sarah McGee, et al. v. City of Los Angeles, et al., USDC Central District of California Case No. 98-2043GHK, then-Chief Bernard Parks agreed to implement Special Order No. 1, making compliance with state law regarding return of firearms an express policy of the LAPD. Once again, LAPD has ignored state law as well as its own policy, and the result is the destruction of priceless collector's items valued in the aggregate at nearly three-quarters-of-a-million dollars.

The matter filed on Friday is captioned Wayne William Wright v. Charles L. Beck, et al., USDC Central District of California Case No. 2:15-cv-05805-R-PJW. A copy of the complaint is linked here.

I should note that this post is from an associate at the Michel law firm, headed by Chuck Michel. C.D. Michel represents the NRA, the CRPA (Cal Rifle and Pistol Association - he's also the president of the CRPA), and is one of the leading litigators and civil rights activists focused on the 2A in California.

The case described in the above thread has not yet been resolved.
 
OK, I am a retired Chief of Police in Colorado with 36yrs as an LE. I was involved in a shooting at my current job as a security officer for John Hendricks, Discovery Channel Owner at a fancy resort in Colorado along with his houses and properties that we protect there. I responded to an active shooter on the highway near the resort in Sept. of this year. I fired my custom Stag LH AR-15 that was worth over $2000. I kept the suspect pinned down with my AR until LE arrived on scene. They confiscated several guns from me and my partner. I teach gun classes at the resort so I always have multiple guns with me. I got back all the other guns after a couple of weeks but they still have my AR-15 in evidence. I meet with the DA on the 21st of the month and will ask about my gun. The guy was not hit, by some miracle and is in custody. for many years I carried a hand built 1911 that was worth about $2600 at the time. I never thought that it would be taken as evidence and luckily that never happened. It has made me re-think what I am willing to give up in the event of a shooting. I was the good guy in this case and am without my rifle for who knows how long. Makes one think about getting involved in any situation knowing how the process works.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top