Early 19-3 3" 1968ish

Joined
Feb 17, 2024
Messages
357
Reaction score
662
Does this barrel to frame look right look right? I have heard there are a few around but not many. S.N. K7 Thanks, Don
 

Attachments

  • IMG_1193 (1).jpg
    IMG_1193 (1).jpg
    36.1 KB · Views: 260
  • IMG_1194.jpg
    IMG_1194.jpg
    39.7 KB · Views: 199
Register to hide this ad
I'm now wondering if it's the rear sight. This one appears to run to end of frame, where yours stops a bit shy. The rear sight is a 2 white dot with the typical notch. So we know that is not correct, wonder if the rear base was changed also. If it was and is longer than original, this might create that effect maybe?
 
Yeah, at least to my eye, SouthNarcs gun looks right; there's a slight radius down to the barrel rib. The OPs looks too squared off. I can't resolve the pictures clear enough to see if it's a too long rear sight base or the frame itself
 
The rear sight tang runs the length of the frame on the 2 1/2 inch guns. For my money, they should all have been that way, instead of stopping short of the barrel.

There is something very wrong with that barrel fit. I find it hard to believe it left the factory in that configuration!
 
I did a little comparing and I think your gun started life as a 2.5 inch. That explains the round butt and actually the squared off frame at the barrel. It appears the longer barrel guns and I think even the three inch had a step down. The 2.5 does not have this step down and th barrel ramp is taller, matching up to the frame.

So you have a original 2.5 inch gun with a 3 inch barrel, they just were never meant for each other.

attachment.php
 

Attachments

  • pix869401204.jpg
    pix869401204.jpg
    90.4 KB · Views: 239
Last edited:
I'm no expert, but when I zoom in on the photos, there seems to be a misalignment of the barrel's lines with the lines of the frame.
Looks like a swapped barrel to me.
 
I did a little comparing and I think your gun started life as a 2.5 inch. That explains the round butt and actually the squared off frame at the barrel. It appears the longer barrel guns and I think even the three inch had a step down. The 2.5 does not have this step down and th barrel ramp is taller, matching up to the frame.

So you have a original 2.5 inch gun with a 3 inch barrel, they just were never meant for each other.

attachment.php
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
There's the correct answer. That Model 19-3 started life with a 2 1/2" barrel and someone swapped it for a 3" barrel.
 
As others have noted the factory 3" uses the same frame style as the 4" and 6" with a round butted frame instead of square,
those frames top strap "step down" at the front so they mate cosmetically to the barrel rib.

The reason the 2.5" snub frame didn't step down is because the frame mates up against the front site ramp, they lengthened the rear site leaf to go all the way to the end of the frame so it looked right and mated right to the front sight ramp base.
Btw the 2" Model 15's have the same setup.
 
Last edited:
I wonder that also fmj. It's an early barrel I would think with the pinned ramp. So what 357 wore a 3" barrel back then?
 
Last edited:
Back
Top