Found in wall.....Loaded too...After 70 years.

JMHO: The contractor should return the gun to the homeowner AND tell the homeowner about its possible connection to a crime. Then let the homeowner decide what to do.
IF the contractor doesn't return the gun, report his thieving butt to the police! :mad:
 
Got a related question. If a contractor is hired to demolish, remove debris, then construct something new in it's place is he entitled to keep anything he finds?
 
Got a related question. If a contractor is hired to demolish, remove debris, then construct something new in it's place is he entitled to keep anything he finds?

Reasonable man concept?

If the contract said "remove & dispose of construction debris",
I'd think if the contractor found a sack of gold coins in the
stuff, that would be something other than 'construction debris',
and he'd be obligated to give em to the homeowner.

If your grandson tossed your wallet into the garbage bin, and
the collection guys saw it as the bin tipped, would you not expect
them to make an effort to return it to the 'home' of the trash can?
 
Hiding evidence
Tampering with evidence, covering up finger prints.
Stealing
Covering up a crime

That's jail time.
 
Steve912, I asked the question because there are businesses that clean out basements, attics, garages, etc. for the contents. There are businesses that demolish homes and barns too. How would the law view this?
 
Steve912, I asked the question because there are businesses that clean out basements, attics, garages, etc. for the contents. There are businesses that demolish homes and barns too. How would the law view this?

No qualified legal advice here, just my take.

Those are two very different jobs. One, the "taking away"
IS the job; if you contract some work involving demolition
of existing structure, the "taking away" is an additional
service to the primary purpose of the contract (put in
a window, add a doorway, etc).

If you hire somebody to clean out contents of basement, attic,
garage, you reasonably expect him to take everything away and
leave you empty space. "Take all this stuff, make it go away."
Unless you specified something else in the contract, the
hauler can do whatever he wants, and it's his business. If
he finds a chest of gold, the reasonable man could (again,
IMO) say "you told him to take EVERYTHING, without qualification,
it's now his."

If you hire someone to tear down a wall, say, for installing
a window, and to take away the debris, the "reasonable man"
(IMO) would say "take away" meant "take way the broken drywall,
cut studs, nails and whatever other building material was
displaced in the process. If the contractor found Grandpa's
gold doubloon horde--or an old .38--inside the tear-down
area, I don't see the reasonable man thinking "oh, that's
part of the removed prior construction, so it's the contractor's
to do with, as he pleases.

Either way, sounds (to my non-lawyer-ish ear) like a dispute in
this area *might* go either way--civil suit, for contract violation,
or theft..
 
Only to stoke the coals for the sake of playing devils advocate, but in a very obtuse (deliberately) sort of comparison, how does this stack up, morally, against say..... The Maritime Law Of Salvage...

That said, and to quote a character whose name I can't remember from The Kiterunner -
"There is only ONE sin, and it is theft."
 
Last edited:
Theft, tampering with evidence, obstruction of justice...so many charges could be associated with this Contractors crime. If convicted or even just charged with of any of them no one would ever hire him again. If he would do this, I have to wonder what he's done previously.
 
All we really know is that the handgun had five live rounds and one spent casing. Not sure how we get to your latter two claims . . .

Theft, tampering with evidence, obstruction of justice...so many charges could be associated with this Contractors crime. If convicted or even just charged with of any of them no one would ever hire him again. If he would do this, I have to wonder what he's done previously.
 
What would I do???

I'd dig around in the basement.:eek:


If the gun has no criminal past, I think somebody has themselves a nice antique or maybe a shooter. The only other problem is if the gun is part of an estate and the family owns it. But then, I'm no Cajun Lawyer.:D
 
Last edited:
I am curious, for those who believe the gun belongs to the former owner, if drugs are found in a home, does that absolve the current owner who claims they are not his?
 
All we really know is that the handgun had five live rounds and one spent casing. Not sure how we get to your latter two claims . . .
The operative word there is "could"...We don't know the guns true history...But I'm amazed that a Contractor would risk his livelihood like this.
 
.... The Maritime Law Of Salvage...
Ah, yes. Maritime Law of Salvage. I have a story about that:

An aerostat is an unmanned blimp on a tether. Typically has a radar or perhaps other sensor on it. At one point I was involved in helping some aerostat guys trying to sell some. They told me the story:

An aerostat's tether broke and the aerostat drifted away from its base in Florida and out over the Gulf of Mexico. A couple of F16s were sent out after it with orders to shoot it down. (Probably to prevent the radar from being lost or compromised.) They shot it full of holes, largely to no avail, but, as night fell, the aerostat gradually floated down to the surface of the gulf.

The next day the authorities send a ship out early to retrieve it. They discover some radom yahoo has it lashed to his little boat and won't give it back.

He clams Maritime Law of Salvage.

While they are arguing with him, the sun comes up and heats up the remaining helium gas in the aerostat. The aerostat rises, and starts to pull the guy's boat up and out of the water.

At this point, the would-be salvager decides that yes, indeed, he will give it back!
 
Last edited:
Has anyone thought that the gun may STILL be the property of SPD? Lets go from there.

Ya could be right, right there...……

I have knowledge of a gun being found in a wall....
No crime apparently connected to it. Maybe.

Here is just the high spots.
This here feller owned a small gun repair / rifle building shop.
One Friday evening two young men came by his shop wanting
to sell an old pistol for some beer money.

What they pulled out of their sack almost gave the gunsmith a coronary, he said.
He ask the young men where they had attained this pistol.
To which they replied, we were helping a man tear down an
old house he owned and we found it in one of the walls. He said we could have it.

The old pistol was marked Co. D & the serial number was 125.

As I would say, the statute of limitation has long been expired.

I have often wondered if Texas would want that pistol back???



.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top