Gold Dots on PC TRR8 Revolver

jnichols2

Member
Joined
Dec 24, 2016
Messages
404
Reaction score
491
I just bought a new S&W TRR8 PC revolver. My shoulder was bothering me a lot, and I didn't have much time. But it really impressed me. I'll have to have a longer session soon, and write a report..

My question is about four gold colored dots on the left side. I have highlighted them with red arrows. The one under the grip looked like a piece of dirt at first.

I would really like to know thier purpose.
 

Attachments

  • Gold Dots.jpg
    Gold Dots.jpg
    49 KB · Views: 104
Register to hide this ad
Who'd a thunk it.

I even looked at them through a 20x loupe. I still couldn't clearly see that they are pins.

Everything on this gun just looks, feels, and sounds of quality. Amazing.
 
Who'd a thunk it.

I even looked at them through a 20x loupe. I still couldn't clearly see that they are pins.

Everything on this gun just looks, feels, and sounds of quality. Amazing.
The Model 327 TRR8 is just about my favorite revolver from this new breed of Smith and Wesson 8-shooter

People may turn their nose up at these multi-piece barreled revolvers, but they are ACCURATE as can be. The Scandium frame brings the weight of the big N-frame wheel gun right down to that of a 4" K-frame.

They are comfortable to carry all day and you do not fatigue as fast during a long shooting session

I got lucky in stumbling on one of the Two Tone versions when they came out.

trr8-2s.jpg
 
I just bought a new S&W TRR8 PC revolver. My shoulder was bothering me a lot, and I didn't have much time. But it really impressed me. I'll have to have a longer session soon, and write a report..

My question is about four gold colored dots on the left side. I have highlighted them with red arrows. The one under the grip looked like a piece of dirt at first.

I would really like to know thier purpose.

I think that the major point about any gun value is how much one instinctively likes/loves it.
Then it comes how accurately it can be shot by its owner.
Some will in a similar instinctive way feel it good in their hands; others won’t, but will be able to adapt and tame it.
Others more won’t be able to admit the gun doesn’t fit their needs, but would try to convince themselves that a top notch , expensive gun must be the best.
I loved TRR8, felt it beautifully balanced in my hand and never had the chance to shoot one single bullet in it due to three broken casings framed in the cylinder of a sample I had bought NIB by a reputable dealer, to whom I returned it for my money back.
I never knew whether this was due to an excessive headspace, as some expert forum member suggested, or any other manufacturing defect, nor had further opportunity to handle it.
While waiting to stumble across a different sample, should destiny wills this should be the case, I had my questions about the gun mainly ignored.
Thus, I browsed the net and forum about its features.
Of course, I do not pretend I analyzed every comment, but I found it quite surprising that most of the members posting about did not mention one single word nor argument-based reason about their declared enthusiasm about the gun being “great” or “the best”.
Some candidly declared they never shot it before giving it away.
Several defects were reported, like headspace issues, barrel unscrewing, light strikes, “heavy and gritty” trigger or cylinder lockup.
Others reported about shooting scandium frame guns “a mistake I will never make again”, or “appealing until one shoots them”.
Very few reported the type and amount of ammo they used to shoot , a significant amount being 38 specials, and just one declaring recoil comparable to “+P in 686 2.5”” or “no difference compared to 686 L”.
So I liked very much your post , appreciated the question I frankly confess I did not dare ask, and look forward for a detailed report (plus target/grouping shots ?).
Best wishes for your shoulder ( topical NSAID patches may be useful, unless rest or surgery/rehab are mandatory for anatomical lesions).
 
I shot Monarch Brass 158 gr FMJ. Not the best, but not the worst.
At 7 yards single action slow, I got one 1" group of 5 touching, with a 3/4" group of 3 a little lower. All were inside the 2" bullseye. The next 8 were rapid fire double action, a 3 1/2" group.

Considering my normal skill, this was super for the first time with a new gun. After shooting the other two guns and coming back, I was a little sore and started flinching. Clint Eastwood, he likes N Frames too, said I should know my limitations, so I packed it in. But I think I shot enough to know this gun suits me pretty well. There were no issues besides my shoulder.

My shoulder feels OK now. I'll find out next week if it's an old injury or arthritis. It does respond to rest, topical NSAID, and Ibruprofin.

I miss shooting my 1978 Model 29-2, but Clint and I both need to slow down with those .44 MAGs. :D :D
 
scandium frames use titanium pins

Somewhere above it was stated that the pins that you're referring to are stainless but they are actually titanium on Scandium framed Smith & Wesson revolvers.. a whole lot less apt 2 fracturing compared to their stainless counterparts as far as I can tell.. from time to time you will hear about people who have broken a hammer stud or a trigger stud or even a rebound slide stud almost all of those are either mild steel or stainless steel I don't think I've heard of a titanium one fracturing as of yet.
 
Talking about lightweight N frames, I got to see 4 aluminum frame experimental N frames at the NRA convention. They were in the collection of the author of the S&W bible.
 
Back
Top