PearlJamFan
Member
- Joined
- Dec 22, 2013
- Messages
- 20
- Reaction score
- 0
This is about single stack and double stack guns with safetys.
I always liked thin single stack guns because I don't mind carrying them on me because they are so slim and I can't feel them. But than I noticed that a single stack with a holster is as thick as a double stack gun with just a belt clip mounted on it. I think I want to go in that direction and get a double stack with a belt clip attached to the slide, but than I heard that it's wise to carry that set up with one OUT of the chamber because nothing is covering the trigger. If that's true, would it better to have a gun with a safety and keep one in the chamber so it's faster to activate the gun? Isn't it? Isn't faster to activate a thumb safety than to cock the gun? Or am I wrong? I think having a thumb safety is the best way to carry for ME, what do you guys think?
And here is the second part to the question:
(this part is if you AGREE that I should get a gun with a double stack with a safety)
What do you guys recommend for a DOUBLE STACK GUN, RELIABLE, COMPACT, WITH A THUMB SAFETY, AND ACCEPTS A RELIABLE 33 ROUND MAGAZINE (33 rd mag will not be for daily carry, it's for when I use it in a SHTF scenario. (I was thinking of the M&P Compact, but I don't like the ambi safety, it's too pertruding)
M&P compact has a model with a safety, and is 33 round mag compatible, and it's compact. Everything I want, but I hate the ambi safety. Maybe I dremmel off the other sides safety? Or cut it off some how? Can I do that with a saw?
I was thinking of the SR9C because it has such a nice trigger, but it doesn't have a 33 round mag at all. I've heard somebody makes one, but I can't find videos of one or find one anywhere.
The Springfield makes a service model XD that has a safety and that has a 33 round mag, but it's not compact..
Those are the only manufacturers that I really looked into, Ruger, Springfield, and Smith & Wesson M&P Series..
Anybody have any information on any other guns that fit my criteria I definitely haven't checked all of them.
I always liked thin single stack guns because I don't mind carrying them on me because they are so slim and I can't feel them. But than I noticed that a single stack with a holster is as thick as a double stack gun with just a belt clip mounted on it. I think I want to go in that direction and get a double stack with a belt clip attached to the slide, but than I heard that it's wise to carry that set up with one OUT of the chamber because nothing is covering the trigger. If that's true, would it better to have a gun with a safety and keep one in the chamber so it's faster to activate the gun? Isn't it? Isn't faster to activate a thumb safety than to cock the gun? Or am I wrong? I think having a thumb safety is the best way to carry for ME, what do you guys think?
And here is the second part to the question:
(this part is if you AGREE that I should get a gun with a double stack with a safety)
What do you guys recommend for a DOUBLE STACK GUN, RELIABLE, COMPACT, WITH A THUMB SAFETY, AND ACCEPTS A RELIABLE 33 ROUND MAGAZINE (33 rd mag will not be for daily carry, it's for when I use it in a SHTF scenario. (I was thinking of the M&P Compact, but I don't like the ambi safety, it's too pertruding)
M&P compact has a model with a safety, and is 33 round mag compatible, and it's compact. Everything I want, but I hate the ambi safety. Maybe I dremmel off the other sides safety? Or cut it off some how? Can I do that with a saw?
I was thinking of the SR9C because it has such a nice trigger, but it doesn't have a 33 round mag at all. I've heard somebody makes one, but I can't find videos of one or find one anywhere.
The Springfield makes a service model XD that has a safety and that has a 33 round mag, but it's not compact..
Those are the only manufacturers that I really looked into, Ruger, Springfield, and Smith & Wesson M&P Series..
Anybody have any information on any other guns that fit my criteria I definitely haven't checked all of them.