Hi Sal,
Thanks for your thoughts. This gun is what a relative called "tight." No wobble, no loose joints, no creaking when she gets up in the morning....
The reason I initially worked on the gun was to learn as much as I could about the gun and its history. I also felt it would renew a bond I had with my late grandfather (it did). I already feel an ownership I didn't feel previous to cleaning the gun and talking to you folks/collectors. I didn't work on the gun myself to avoid spending money on the gun. I'll drop shiny coins when i know what's wrong w trigger, etc. and when I'm ready to have it professionally cleaned.
I will keep the original ivory stocks for above reasons.
I look forward to your additional comments, Sal. It's really impressive how many of you spend a great deal of time and effort helping the newbies out. Thanks!
Pam
Pam, Us old older guys have little else to do. We can be very helpful and courteous. However, at times, we can be brutally honest.
Weigh advice from the sources that offer it. You choose the proper method that suits you. The majority of the advice is spot on.
You have found the correct haunt of us chivalrous (well most of us) old (many of us) S&W collectors and preservationists. Many of us rescue old and "sick" S&Ws like others might rescue old or abused animals. And, most likely, we rescue animals, too. (I'm a sucker for a stray canine that need a meal, is sick or has a sad face ).
After most of my life in automotive restorative repairs and full body and mechanical restorations, I have had the sad duty of informing people who were sentimentally attached to an old car, that they are likely going to spend more money in restoration than the car is worth and would likely not be a wise investment. This statement was brutally honest, yes, but necessary. The owners could then make a wiser choice yet most times, against advice, they proceeded with the repairs and / or restoration.
My technique was to put up a full and fair evaluation, up front. Best case to worst case scenarios.
However, sentiment "is" love. It's a all or nothing proposition, most times not making any common sense what so ever. But, we fragile humans grasp sentiment tightly, as we should. Sentiment and love are places we feel safe and secure.
About 25 years ago, I had a in-depth discussion with Norm Flayderman, the sole antique guru of the time for many decades prior and until his death several years back. In his original and unique publications on antique firearms identification and value (where there were no other publications that came anywhere near the quality of his) he wrote that mechanical condition and bore (the inside of the barrel not a person) have no variance on the value of an antique firearm.
I contested this with him in conversations at social functions. Being a master mechanic almost my entire adult life, my premier concern would be mechanical function. To me, what good is it if it doesn't function properly ?
Words from a guy who does ground-up restorations ... everything not only has to look as it did when new ... it has to function as it did when new.
I also coined a short phrase that "new is only new once". After that there can be, "like" new (to a very rigid set of standards) but THAT is it. It will never again be "new".
In summation, I suggest you focus on the mechanical issues first. After that's taken care of, decide where to go from there, reevaluating how much you have invested at that time.
PS: we are not so old that we do not recognize the double entendres and innuendos but we're just loving it. Welcome to the group.

Last edited: