Who is to blame if a person pay $77.00 a thousand for primers on a free market auction? I don't think it's the seller.
Some people might not think this is ethical...but I think since there is no real "crisis" all is fair. Now if there was a crisis, then I'd be appalled. Nothing wrong with making a little money when you have something that other people want. I think "Beanie Babies" and those "Tickle Me Elmo" dolls did this for a short time a while back- people paid exorbitant prices for that stuff because they "had to have it right now!"
I have a few cases of primers and since the perceived value that someone else sees in them exceeds my perceived value of them, I see no ethical reason that the value perceived shouldn't be realized...by me.
I wonder how many cases of primer I'd have to sell to get a Registered Magnum?
I'm going to believe that my chances are about 33%, because one of three things will probably happen:
A.) The "rush" to get stuff will finally subside. When is anyone's guess- maybe six months, maybe a year or so...and things will get back to normal, yet people don't start selling off their stock.
B.) Something happens to make it get worse...
Either laws are enacted, stuff is taxed, or a conflict breaks out- anything that makes it harder to get ammunition and components than it already may be.
C.) Supply finally gets caught up to demand, and all the people do start needing some money and they start selling off their stuff and a few deals can be made here and there. Prices on "on the shelf stuff" also stabilize at a more reasonable level.
If there is another scenario, please let me in on it.
If you think about it, this is mainly how post-war America was for a few years...guns and ammunition was very hard to come by for a time, and it took a few years to fill hardware store shelves- those of us who remember correctly.