So I just picked up a new 642 UC and was considering picking up a new holster. Ran across the Harrys Holsters Icon 2.0 and it seemed to spark my interest. I was wondering if anyone here has any opinions on them and if they are worth the money before I order one.
Harry's Holsters Icon 2.0. Opinions, worth it?
- Thread starter Sammy
- Start date
Register to hide this ad
Mine is a really high quality build and very slim. It comes a bit high around the trigger guard of my 642. While it doesn't actually interfere with a firing grip, I feel the holster when I grip the revolver. Compared to a Phlster City Special which I also own, the Phlster conceals slightly better (on my body) in on-the-belt AIWB because its additional bulk acts as a wedge. The Phlster is also high quality but comes with a plastic clip, while Harry's uses a double metal clip. I use the Harry's on a Hunter Constantine belt to wear under sweats and the like, and the Phlster if I'm going to wear it on my trousers belt.
I own probably more holsters than I'll ever use but I also own two of Harry's Holsters for my Sig P365s and my S&W J-Frames. For me, the Ikon 2.0 is the most comfortable, concealable, revolver holster I own. It is my "go to" every time. If I'm carrying IWB, I only use Harry's holsters. Just wish they would restock the IWB for the BG 2.0. Just my two cents.
OP
I was also looking at the Phlster City special. Thanks for the input
OP
Thanks, I seem to hear similar opinions from other owners. Thinking I may end up doing it.
