DWalt
Member
SN 22xxxx suggests a likely 1913-14 shipment, definitely a 1905 third change.
As far as my English language goes, well I have a good « Texan teacher » here who helps me to improve myself as I enjoy discussing with him.![]()
Thank you
Oh, and they didn't care much for my "Spanish" speaking abilities when I was actually in Spain. Seems they speak a slightly different version there as well.
Dale
The first time I was in Madrid, I spoke to a lady at an information booth when I first arrived. To start with, I told her - in Spanish - that I grew up on the Mexican border and learned my Spanish there, so I wasn't sure how well I would do in asking her some questions. She smiled and said politely, "You are doing fine. I can understand you." We then proceeded to have a nice conversation and she gave me the information that I was seeking. Humility can take you a long way.![]()
Careful Lady Smith,
If I know anything about Texans it's that they are ornery folks who will steer you in the wrong direction any time they can. (Sounds rather shady to me, if you want my honest opinion.)
Be extremely cautious with anything this "Texan teacher" may be telling you.
And most likely, whoever this person is, is probably teaching you to speak Texan and not the Queen's English...…...which will only be of any use to you at all if you are in a honkeytonk, on an oilrig, working a ranch, or trying desperately to get into a fist fight.
At one time I knew just enough Spanish to get slapped, shot, cut, hit in the head with a 2x4...…...and maybe order a chicken dinner and a beer.
(Oh, and they didn't care much for my "Spanish" speaking abilities when I was actually in Spain. Seems they speak a slightly different version there as well.)
Dale
Teacher,
I was always disappointed they taught us to speak the Queen's English, as you say, at school and never taught us the U.S. version.
I know my english language is not perfect, and I try to improve myself, but I think the most important thing when you are speaking a second language is to be understood.
Unfortunately, sometimes people don't make any effort to understand what you are saying...
Everybody here made the effort to understand what I said so far though.![]()
What??????
Je disais,
"Professeur,
J'ai toujours été déçue qu'ils nous apprennent à parler l'anglais de la reine, comme tu dis, à l'école et qu'ils ne nous apprenaient jamais la version Américaine.
Je sais que mon anglais n'est pas parfait, et j'essaie de m'améliorer, mais je pense que la chose la plus importante quand tu parles une seconde langue c'est d'être compris.
Malheureusement, parfois les gens ne font aucun effort pour comprendre ce que tu es en train de dire...
Tout le monde ici a fait un effort pour comprendre ce que je disais jusqu'à présent cependant. "
Ok don't blame me friend, I apologize but it was only too tempting![]()
Hi guys,
Well, this 1905 is now at home !
Does anyone know what is the number which is on the grip frame please ?
Thank you
![]()
Given the serial number, and supposing the rear sight has not been changed, you very like have the "Large Screw Spring Up" version---a rather unusual design which popped up in the middle of more conventional sights. The sights preceding and following the spring up sight were raised and lowered by means of what I'll call a jack screw----some under the sight screwed into the frame, others screwed through the sight and bearing on the frame. The elevation screw on this sight is a simple cap screw, bearing down on the sight and screwing into the frame. The sight tang has been been bent, and transformed into a spring such that loosening the elevation screw allows the sight to rise----tighten the screw, and the sight goes down.
The possible bad news is the tempering process was less than precise, and the sight tang/spring may or may not function as intended. The weaker springs raise the sight only slightly, and shoot loose more or less immediately. The strongest springs function as intended---raising the sight as desired, and holding it there. Those in between raise the sight adequately, but shoot loose.
These sights came into being around #195504 (.38 Special)/76613 (.32/20), (1911, +/-), and given S&W's sometime unwise policy of using up old parts before moving on, remained in use until around 379988 (.38 Special)/95573 (.32/20), (1923,+/-).
Ralph Tremaine
The #1013 with first 1 stamped sideways does not look like a probable factory stamped # but it might be the aftermarket refinisher's # or their date stamp; 10/1913.
Thank you. I’m a little confused though.
I’m not sure to have understood very well, I’m sorry, please be gentle.
If I understand correctly, you mean there is no screw under the rear sight to raise or lower the sight as on my 67-6 for example, but a spring.
What I’m not sure to understand is « shoot loose », could you please explain what it means ? I think it means it doesn’t hold the sight elevation in the position we had set.
Maybe that’s the reason why the front sight was modified
I need to bring it to the range and we will see.
Thank you in advance.![]()
As previously noted by others, the front sight has been changed somewhere along the line. The present sight is not a S&W sight, could have been fashioned from a Patridge (although I don't know why), and likely was changed in order to have a thicker blade-----the standard blade being the so-called Thin Round Top Blade (which is the same thickness as the slot it fits into---probably .040".
Ralph Tremaine
I agree 100% on the Pachmayr Gripper. Whenever I buy a Smith, first thing I do is get a set of Pachmayr's, and put back the original grips. I shoot a lot better with the Gripper than I do with the stock grips. And it sure saves wear and tear on the originals.Madame (Mlle.?)-
Be aware that this gun was made several years before the company began heat treating cylinders for extra strength. (In late 1919) Do not fire modern loads marked Plus P in this gun.
It was made about the time of World War I and is over 100 years old! It appeals to collectors more than to modern shooters.
But it it is still a better gun for shooting targets at 27 yards (25 meters?) than the snub nosed M-36 you mentioned. That one is a sort of niche gun, intended for concealed carry and close range defense. It is not meant for target shooting at longer ranges. A really good shooter can get better results, but the M-36 is mostly sold to people expecting to shoot a criminal at from about 2 meters to maybe ten meters. Actually, it may be used in a hand to hand fight, with the muzzle contacting an enemy!
What you should have bought, had one been available, is the K -38 Masterpiece/Model 14, a more modern gun meant especially for target shooting, or a .357 Magnum in any of several models, fitted with modern adjustable sights. Those can also fire the .38 Special cartridge as a lighter load, and they make excellent target guns, as well as being superior for defense, against evil men or against dangerous animals.
Some members here are mainly collectors. They disparage rubber grips/handle plates. (Stocks) The Pachmayr Gripper is intended to fit the hand better and to control recoil better. It is in fact a better handle for shooting! If it fits your hand well, no need for new grips. I have that same model of grip on my Ruger GP-100, and other Pachmayr grips on my Smith & Wessons. They especially help to retain a firm grasp on the gun if it's raining or if one's hand is sweaty from nerves when going in harm's way, where you think someone is waiting in the shadows to kill you. This is the voice of experience. I can assure you, I prefer a good rubber or wooden grip to a slick one of pearl or ivory when the gun may need to be used in earnest, not for casual target shooting.
However, remove the grip and inspect under it for rust, as moisture can become trapped there and rust the gun. Pull the grips off (not just rubber ones) and oil under them several times a year so the gun's frame doesn't rust.
I think you will find that old gun to be very accurate. Just use standard .38 Special ammunition or the flat nosed wadcutter loads, meant for target shooting. Avoid modern high velocity ammunition in a gun of that age.
You clearly read and write well in English. If you can buy it in France or on the Net, get a book called, "The Handgun", by the late British author Geoffrey Boothroyd. It covers pistols from earliest times until about 1970, when the book was published. I can think of no other book so complete in dealing with its subject, and it will give you a really good understanding of firearms. You will see guns like yours and many other Smith & Wesson and other handguns. The book usually isn't very expensive and is well worth some effort to acquire. But it is a big, thick, well made book that is fairly heavy. Don't drop it on your bare toe, ha, ha!
It's always good to welcome a new French member. One of my favorite members is a French herpetologist who lives near Paris. I enjoy discussing snakes with him in The Lounge forum. Please join us there to discuss almost any subject, not just guns.