Hey S&W How about an AR Carbine in 9mm ?

Engine49guy

Member
Joined
May 1, 2009
Messages
8,074
Reaction score
9,130
Location
South Florida
Been tempted lately to pick up the new M&P Sport II but my last .223 carbine usually sat in the safe on range day simply because I prefer the longer site radius and feel of the standard 21" barrel USGI version for outdoor plinking .....
FF to what has kept me up at night lately... that is if S&W would offer their AR carbine chambered in 9mm at the current market price of under $600 not only would I buy one in an instant..... my guess is Im not alone in that thought.


A 9mm AR Carbine makes alot of sense to me for several reasons :
Slightly cheaper ammo that is common with handguns, more sensible for home defense with more bullet mass that has lower wall penetration especially since the new hollow point designs have improved as man stoppers causing many to return to the 9mm handgun.
(BTW 9mm is also much more forgiving on steel plate hanging targets ).

From a profit standpoint it seems the market is flooded with sub $700 AR carbines in .223 right now but Im not seeing many 9mm carbines in that price range (if any) especially with the S&W lifetime warranty.

The 9mm AR Carbine would also be much cheaper to build (shorter build time and less parts = Higher Co. profit ) since the operating system is simple blowback
(Right side 9mm bolt pictured below)


(Left side of 9mm bolt)


Simple blowback means the 9mm AR carbine does not require a gas tube, rotating bolt or locking lugs and as such makes the barrel much easier to machine at the breech, BTW it also does not require the forward assist assembly since the bolt does not lock into the barrel.

Colt simply pins a magazine adapter into their standard .223 lower mag well (pictured below) then adds a larger brass deflector,


If S&W wanted to "One up them" they could offer quick change adapters that would adapt various mags to their carbine,
In other words one adapter would accept M&P mags while another would adapt the carbine to accept Model 459/59 mags, another for CZ, another for Glock etc so the 9mm carbine could swap mags with the users choice of 9mm handgun should need arise.

A little 9mm Carbine plinking porn:
[ame]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VLCkupJ3rUM[/ame]
 
Last edited:
Register to hide this ad
I agree with you. I looked at some of the pistol caliber carbines for a good while before I decided to bite the bullet and buy my M&P15.

If S&W would come out with one at a reasonable price point I think they'd have a hard time keeping up with demand.
 
I've been hoping for the same thing I would buy one in a heart beat I'am looking at a Just Right Carbine right now that takes my M&P mags.
Come on S&W M&P 15 in 9mm!
 
I'm sitting on a mountain of 9mm ammo but shoot .38 Special and .45 ACP/AR almost exclusively.

I'd buy a S&W 9mm carbine in a heartbeat.
 
Last edited:
I would love to have one, I've been looking at other brands but just can't pull the trigger (groan). If S&W made one I'd get on that line.
 
The lower/components, buffers, bolts, and magazines are more expensive than the 5.56 varieties.

The same price point would not happen.

A USGI rifle uses a 20" barrel.

5.56/223 often penetrates LESS in building materials than pistol calibers.

Most people buy 9mm AR carbines due to ammo cost, familiarity, ability to shoot at indoor pistol ranges, reduces noise/blast, and quite simply, because they are fun.
 
The lower/components, buffers, bolts, and magazines are more expensive than the 5.56 varieties.

The same price point would not happen.

A USGI rifle uses a 20" barrel.

5.56/223 often penetrates LESS in building materials than pistol calibers.

Most people buy 9mm AR carbines due to ammo cost, familiarity, ability to shoot at indoor pistol ranges, reduces noise/blast, and quite simply, because they are fun.

Another advantage to the 9mm carbine is considerably less muzzle blast compared to the .223, Recently had a shooter on the lane next to me at my local indoor range shooting a 16" AR15...NOT PLEASENT !

All valid points except I would argue a lower is a lower and the 9mm AR parts actually cost the company less to produce... of course the factory final unit cost will not really reduce market price after the S&W marketing guys realize they can charge more for a 9mm carbine (like Colt did) despite that the product is simpler and cost less to produce...thats pretty much expected at least in the beginning until demand drops or the market is saturated but its a goldmine in the beginning IMO as they are already setup to build the AR .

I primarily shoot 55 grain M193 FMJ ball in my SP1 and 62 grain M855 SS 109 Green tip in my HBARs , IIRC the low penetration advantage of .223 was primarily with soft point or hollow point ammo but am going to have to study up on that issue, Of course Im not planning to ever use a 9mm Carbine as a home defense gun either, so the point for me at least is moot.
On a side note I recall shooting a dumpster once with 55 grain M193 and it pierced side 1, keyholed side 2 and left a lump in the lid the size of a golfball, guessing the heavier M855 geen tip with tungsten carbide inserts will penetrate even better.

Forgot to mention that while standard SP1 and HBAR barrels are 20" long they are 21" to then end of the flash suppressor ... ;) :)
 
Last edited:
Using self defense ammo ,handgun calibers often penetrate more than 223/556 inside a house. Even when both over penetrate the handgun caliber often still goes further. This will of course vary based on the size of your house, it's construction and anything that's standing up against the walls

Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk
 
They could build it with a 30 rd mag that interchanges with the M&P series. Might convince some shooters to come over to their pistol line for compatibility.
 
They could build it with a 30 rd mag that interchanges with the M&P series. Might convince some shooters to come over to their pistol line for compatibility.
Not a bad idea. I have zero interest I'm a handgun caliber carbine but I think it would be better to use mags that are already plentiful. Maybe UZI mags if that's possible or Colt mags or dare I say Glock mags.

I know when I'm buying a firearm one of the first things I look at is mag price and availability along with interchangeability.

Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk
 
Last edited:
Not a bad idea. I have zero interest I'm a handgun caliber carbine but I think it would be better to use mags that are already plentiful. Maybe UZI mags if that's possible or Colt mags or dare I say Glock mags.

That would pretty much be the only reason I might be interested since I already have some of their 30+ round mags. More of a fun or last ditch firearm since 9mm is plentiful and generally not too terribly expensive by comparison.

I doubt, however, they'd make it usable with the Glock magazine if the idea ever gets any traction.
 
I purchased a PSA 9mm AR kit last summer/fall when they were on sale for $399.00 with free shipping. Assembled it on a $35.00 Anderson lower and away I went. It functions fine and is a blast to shoot. With less than $450.00 invested in the whole deal how can you go wrong. I keep watching the PSA web site waiting for the kit to go on sale again. I'll buy another one if I can get it cheap.
 
All valid points except I would argue a lower is a lower and the 9mm AR parts actually cost the company less to produce... of course the factory final unit cost will not really reduce market price after the S&W marketing guys realize they can charge more for a 9mm carbine (like Colt did) despite that the product is simpler and cost less to produce...thats pretty much expected at least in the beginning until demand drops or the market is saturated but its a goldmine in the beginning IMO as they are already setup to build the AR.
The 9mm lowers are more complex. A standard lower requires the appropriate mag block, and the bolt and buffers are weighted with tungsten which is more expensive than steel.
 
While the world has moved away from it ...... the 9mm H&K MP-5 was king of the hill for years....

As a HD or PDW or urban SHTF gun I like my Beretta CX-4 with 17-20 (and 30s now) round 92 magazines set up w/ a 92 Centurion.

I've got a 300 lumen Streamlight on mine.......... it's good to go out to 75-80 yds. or so.

At 29 inches they are actually 3" shorter than a AR with the stock collapsed and weight in at only 5.6 lbs.......about a pound less than a AR.

A 9mm S&W AR that would take 569xx mags would be cooool given Meg-gar still makes 20 rd mags!!!!!!!!
 
Last edited:
Unfortunately, I am thinking about swapping to a glock because I only care about home defense, and the bottom falling out on everything. If it does, I only want to have one type of ammunition to be concerned about. Carrying multiple cal doesn't work well for that...

Hell, give me a a damn SD adapter kit for a basic 5.56 lower. I'm sure that we can find an upper AR9 to fit. Or my noob *** could be completely wrong on that part. Wouldn't be a first.
 
Last edited:
I guess not everybody......

I guess not everybody is as nutty about carbines as I am. I got a Kel Tec Sub2000 Gen 2 in 9mm with a blowback action. and I got a 33 round Glock mag for it. The son of a gun even folds in half. It doesn't feel 'cheap' at all.

Next, I've got my sights on a Henry .22 lever carbine.

It's too bad but S&W isn't in the running at all for these types of guns.
 
I guess not everybody is as nutty about carbines as I am. I got a Kel Tec Sub2000 Gen 2 in 9mm with a blowback action. and I got a 33 round Glock mag for it. The son of a gun even folds in half. It doesn't feel 'cheap' at all.

Next, I've got my sights on a Henry .22 lever carbine.

It's too bad but S&W isn't in the running at all for these types of guns.

Almost 2 weeks ago I was in my LGS - they had two Kel-tecs on the wall - I was purchasing some ammo and a couple magazines - as I checked out I asked if both were in .40 (expecting the answer to be yes) - They said "no" - one was a 9mm that takes Glock magazines. I put $150 down and paid the rest/picked it up the next day. Haven't shot it yet - but I am very impressed with it so far....

(Edit for clarification - LGS - one of the Kel-tec on the wall was in .40 and one was in 9mm. I picked up the one in 9mm as they seem to be very rare and hard to find in my area. I've only seen them in .40 at local gun shows and LGS. First time I had run across a Kel-tec 9mm for sale locally.)
 
Last edited:
About everything....

Almost 2 weeks ago I was in my LGS - they had two Kel-tecs on the wall - I was purchasing some ammo and a couple magazines - as I checked out I asked if both were in .40 (expecting the answer to be yes) - They said "no" - one was a 9mm that takes Glock magazines. I put $150 down and paid the rest/picked it up the next day. Haven't shot it yet - but I am very impressed with it so far....

First I"m 90% sure that it does come in .40.:confused:

Anyway, whatever needed fixing on the first gen version has been fixed very well on the new one. The only complaint is that the piece that holds the buffer sticks up and knocks you earmuffs up Other than that it's slicker than cat poop on a linoleaum floor..
 
Back
Top