Houthis 0, US Navy 3

Register to hide this ad
The Virtues of Verbal Engagement

From the WaPo today. So unfortunate...

...U.S. Navy helicopters exchanged fire with Houthi militants aboard four small boats in the southern Red Sea on Sunday morning, sinking three of them and killing their crew, U.S. Central Command said. The militants had been trying to board a Maersk container vessel when the attack happened, Centcom said.


The incident represents a sharp escalation of hostilities between the United States and the Yemen based, Iranian-backed militant group since its maritime attacks began in the wake of the war in Gaza.


According to Centcom, Houthi militants on small boats approached within 20 meters of the Singapore-flagged, Denmark-owned Maersk Hangzhou on Sunday morning, attacking it and attempting to board. U.S. Navy helicopters responding to the ship's distress calls then came under fire from the small boats while attempting to verbally engage with them, Centcom said.


"The U.S. Navy helicopters returned fire in self-defense, sinking three of the four small boats, and killing the crews. The fourth boat fled the area," the statement read.

The helicopters, dispatched from the USS Eisenhower and USS Gravely, did not sustain damage, it added...


Hmm. Maybe the Houthis will consider verbal engagement next time around...
 
Wonder if gun camera video/flight data recorder prevented a clean sweep? Knew a couple of CAS guys who'd have managed to have the last boat make a head on run at a helo.

No idea how the various missiles are launched, but doesn't seem like it would be too hard a problem to back track the course to the launch site. Hitting the launch sites would seem to be a way to discourage further launches. Would also seem to be cheaper in the long term than using SA missiles to take out the missiles in flight.

Forum rules prevent further comment.
 
Back
Top