Do not carry that pistol until you are comfortable carrying it with the round chambered. Period. Stick with the revolver with which you are familiar and comfortable.
From a purely mechanical perspective, one of the safest handguns to carry ready to use (round chambered, cocked, safety engaged) is a 1911. You have the mechanical safety, the grip safety, and the one between your ears that helps you keep the booger hook off the loud switch. One has to be really really dumb and really really clumsy (more than I am, which is a feat) to have an ND with a 1911. I carried one as a duty weapon off and on for several years and it is a very user friendly weapon and quite safe if one is properly trained.
It is not all that hard to have an ND with a revolver, if one is careless. It might be a little harder to do than with a pistol, but the level of negligence required either way is indicative of needing a guardianship far more than a pistol, a car, or a real knife. If you have gone 5 years without being that careless with a revolver, you should easily transition to the pistol without any real risk as long as get a little help with the transition in terms of psychomotor skill training.
At the time I retired, EVERY ND with a semi was the Glock.
Don't blame the gun, blame the person. There's never been an occasion where a gun has gone off without a human present. If there was an ND with a Glock it was because the person involved was not sufficiently trained on that platform.
If you are not comfortable with carrying a semi-auto in condition 1, do not carry it. Train, train, train until you are as comfortable with it as you are with a revolver, which is in condition 1. You are doing yourself a dis-service in the level of protection you are providing yourself and your loved ones if you are not as ready as possible, both physically and mentally.
I am a revolver guy as well, but I've trained with a Glock, a 1911 and a PPK to the point that I can carry any of them in condition 1 and myself in yellow.
I don't blame the gun. But the Glock design (and safety-less striker fire gun especially) are less forgiving of human error, and we are all human.
How is a safety-less semi any less forgiving than a safety-less revolver if both have a round chambered?
Holstered? No real difference. Handling the gun? WAY different. 9 pound revolver trigger where the hammer comes back to an invisible striker on a 6 pound trigger?
No, I understand about the long trigger engagement, etc. I just wanted to actually handle the weapon at the range and get used to it before I start carrying with a round chambered. A friend of mine who is a competition shooter went through the blocks, etc with me, so it isn't a fear of having a chambered round, it;s just my personal desire to become a little more familiar with this gun first.
*I don't blame the gun. But the Glock design (and safety-less striker fire gun especially) are less forgiving of human error, and we are all human. The training of all the cops I worked with was the same, yet somehow the S&W and SIG guys didn't have a problem. I carried the Glock. Chose it when I knew nothing about guns. I sold it and the Glock 26 I had right after retirement.
Yes but,
No way Jose will I ever carry my Shield 9 with chambered round no matter what the possible eventualities. I'll take some chances over other chances and hopefully..................................
Mark
After fighting with those mags, I decided to try a LULA loader. We'll have to see how that works when it gets here later in the week.