OP
armympwjrk
Member
What model 15-22 is this?![]()
That's my opinion![]()
What model 15-22 is this?![]()
That's my opinion![]()
What model 15-22 is this?
In my case I want my cheap practice 22 AR/M-4's to be as close to the weight of my real AR/M-4's as possible.
No sense in practicing with a light weight 22 AR clone only to pick up the real thing & have the feel so different that the practice with the light weight 22 actually hurt the ability to accurately hold & shoot a real AR/M-4.
Yeah, I hear that most often. In my opinion, if I wanted something close to my AR-15 to train with, I would still go with the M&P or I would get a .22lr conversion kit for my AR. The Smith may be plastic but it functions just like the other rifle. That Colt/Umarex appears to be style over function. That thin barrel irks me really bad haha
I understand those that want the same weight to train with, but wouldn't that come at some sort of cost? With the same weight, and less fire power, wouldn't there be less felt recoil (if any?).
Why not just get a 22 upper and use the same lower?
wow ok yall got me sold on the 15-22 now how ever @Brett248vista, what model is that? (It has the front sights and m-4 style front like i want.) Thank yall so much for all the info and quick response
Among all the tactical .22s I picked these two. Both are great rifles. Sig522 is a bit heavy and more accurate. 15-22 is lighter and has a lot more available accessories via AR platform. 15-22 gets more range time.
What are the scopes/red dots you have on those, and how do you like them?
Also how do you like the angled foregrip, I've been thinking about trying one and would love a informed opinion.
- http://gunpowdertherapy.com/wordpress/?p=903. The lower is almost completely a polymer plastic and although it looks like a collapsible stock, it is fixed and nonadjustable. The rifle does come with two 28 round magazines.
The charging handle works similar to your regular platform, however there is no carrier bolt lock. The forward assist functions but does not serve the same purpose as in regular AR-15.
I could be wrong, but just looking at the Chippa Mfour it looks like it uses Commercial spec stocks. Not a train smash if it does, but something to look at.
The forward assist also looks like it is non functional, and the flash hiders are all set screwed on, the barrel is not threaded.
None of those are bad in and of themselves, but it doesn't inspire much confidence.
KBK
- Review: Chiappa MFOUR-22 | Gunpowder Therapy