Since you can not lawfully transfer title to stolen property the dealer owes you your money back. It does not matter if he did not know it was stolen property. I bought a Luger a few years ago and about 6 weeks later got a call from the cops saying it was stolen. I returned it to the dealer and he gave me my money back. He was pissed because it was a consignment gun and he had already paid off the owner. Well about 3 weeks later I got another call saying the cops had messed up and it was not stolen so i went back and bought it back. The dealer was nice about offering the money back and then about giving me first shot at it when they got it back. FWIW possesion of stolen property is a crime and the burden of proof that you did not know it was stolen is on you. Now one stolen gun out of many and a reciept from a dealer is probably going to suffice. The cop offered me the option of having the gun confiscated and me getting nothing if I did not take it back to the shop. Had that happened I would have filed a claim in small claims court and most likely would have won. I know a family that owns a pawn shop and they deal with stolen stuff all the time. They have had to testify in court several times. Since they are upfront about it all and run a legitimate business they lose what they loaned and are due restitution. It it rare for a pawn shop owner to be charged but I have seen it happen twice. One guy was contracting with a group of home invasion thugs to bring him a steady supply of stuff. He clearly knew it was stolen. The other was a owner contracting with homeless people in downtown Seattle to shoplift new stuff. The owner would give them a small payment for it then sell it on ebay. He was telling them just what to steal.
You took the words right out of my mouth. Get legal advice from a lawyer.That's total BS. He's a detective, not a lawyer...
Wrong Wrong Wrong Wrong Wrong. State has to prove you knew or possessed under facts that indicate that you should have known item was stolen. GO back and read my earlier post.
Well, I called the FFL that I purchased the gun from today. He told me that the crook had stolen 32 guns from the victim and it sounds like the bulk of them went through the dealer I purchased this gun from. He said that he is a small dealer that sells from his house and he does not have the resources to refund everyones money and I have to go thorough the court system to get my refund. He did say that if he can move some of the stock he has on hand that he will start giving refunds. If I am one of 32 though I won't be holding my breath. It's my understanding that the only recourse that I have against the dealer is if I can prove that he knew that the gun was stolen, and what it comes down to is if he doesn't have the money I'm out of luck and to run up attorney fees would be futile. Even if the DA does make restitution a part of the crooks sentence he will be in prison for quite some time so I won't hold my breath on that either.
A member that resonded to this thread suggested the Maine Attorney General so I may give them a try, but once again if the dealer has no money whats the sense. It sounds to me like the DA may be my best shot even if it takes awhile.
I guess the lesson here is to know your ffl dealers and be careful.
"... It sounds to me like the DA may be my best shot even if it takes awhile.... "
Well, I called the FFL that I purchased the gun from today. He told me that the crook had stolen 32 guns from the victim and it sounds like the bulk of them went through the dealer I purchased this gun from. He said that he is a small dealer that sells from his house and he does not have the resources to refund everyones money and I have to go thorough the court system to get my refund. He did say that if he can move some of the stock he has on hand that he will start giving refunds. If I am one of 32 though I won't be holding my breath. It's my understanding that the only recourse that I have against the dealer is if I can prove that he knew that the gun was stolen, and what it comes down to is if he doesn't have the money I'm out of luck and to run up attorney fees would be futile. Even if the DA does make restitution a part of the crooks sentence he will be in prison for quite some time so I won't hold my breath on that either.
A member that resonded to this thread suggested the Maine Attorney General so I may give them a try, but once again if the dealer has no money whats the sense. It sounds to me like the DA may be my best shot even if it takes awhile.
I guess the lesson here is to know your ffl dealers and be careful.
For a small at home guy with no resources. sounds like he bought a lot of guns. plus i wonder the story told by the thief explaining that much volume. i would assume some ffl may do some homework before writing that check.
Sorry to hear your story madmikeb.
If you bought a stolen gun from a "Dealer" and now the Police are taking the gun from you, why wouldn't the dealer be responsible for returning your money?
Well, I called the FFL that I purchased the gun from today. He told me that the crook had stolen 32 guns from the victim and it sounds like the bulk of them went through the dealer I purchased this gun from. He said that he is a small dealer that sells from his house and he does not have the resources to refund everyones money and I have to go thorough the court system to get my refund. He did say that if he can move some of the stock he has on hand that he will start giving refunds. If I am one of 32 though I won't be holding my breath. It's my understanding that the only recourse that I have against the dealer is if I can prove that he knew that the gun was stolen, and what it comes down to is if he doesn't have the money I'm out of luck and to run up attorney fees would be futile. Even if the DA does make restitution a part of the crooks sentence he will be in prison for quite some time so I won't hold my breath on that either.
A member that resonded to this thread suggested the Maine Attorney General so I may give them a try, but once again if the dealer has no money whats the sense. It sounds to me like the DA may be my best shot even if it takes awhile.
I guess the lesson here is to know your ffl dealers and be careful.
I'm with paplinker on this. I do not doubt anything the original poster has said. It just seems to me that there is more to this story.
Where did this small dealer get the money to buy 32 guns?
This is speculation on my part, but the dealer was probably offered a smokin' deal. The crook probably fed him a line like, "these were my granddaddy's who just died and I'm helping sell off his estate."
However, in my opinion, the dealer shouldn't be able to profit from this. My guess it that the dealer probably only paid $500 or less for the revolver. If that is the case, then the dealer should be able to easily refund you the difference between his purchase price and sale price. Where did that money go? He couldn't of spent it that fast.
In Virginia, there is no requirement and no method for a gun dealer to check if a used firearm is stolen. While there may be a such a requirement and system for pawn dealers in the state (I don't know), there is no such requirement for gun dealers. In fact, in Virginia, no information about the firearm is transmitted to the State Police.
From what I've been able to ascertain, the perp is a close family member of the victim and the guns weren't all stolen at once.