I like guns. You got a problem with that?

Joined
Jan 24, 2007
Messages
10,358
Reaction score
52,011
Location
Arizona
I'm sometimes asked about my fascination with guns. A substantial number of people think of guns only in the negative, probably due to constant bombardment in the news media about "gun violence." It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out that violence is an action, and guns by themselves do not commit violence. Only people can do that – people with malevolent intent or who have deranged psyches. Guns by themselves are only instruments, and can be used for good or evil. Trying to legislate against them to prevent violence is as futile as legislating against tornadoes and floods. They exist; get used to it. In the hands of good law enforcement and honest law-abiding citizens, guns provide a solid measure of useful self-protection and intervention. Aside from these self-evident facts, I actually like guns for quite a variety of reasons. I'll list them, and further explain.

It's been said that the history of the United States is the history of our guns. From the flintlock muskets and rifles of the American Revolution to the true assault rifles of our present-day military conflicts, the outcome has been most heavily influenced by those very firearms. Examples of them can be held in your hands, taking you back in history to their eras. That trapdoor Springfield rifle is an example of a gun that settled the Western frontier, very similar to those used by Custer's troops at the battle of the Little Big Horn. That bolt-action Model 1903 Springfield rifle built in 1916 may almost certainly have been used in France during World War One. And that classic semiautomatic M1 Garand could have been used to storm the beaches at Normandy or Iwo Jima in World War Two. Heft these arms, understand them, and you will also understand what our forefathers held in their hands to go into battle. These guns are essentially time machines to give you a gateway to the past. You will have an insight into those times like no other. As a collector, you are only a curator of such arms. When you pass, these relics will go on to others, and it's your task, no, your duty, to maintain and preserve them for future generations to also understand their heritage.

Form follows function. And firearms systems have progressed from firelocks to machine guns. Their mechanisms, designed by gifted people, are more often than not quite ingenious. No finer example can be found than that of John Browning's classic Model 1911 .45 pistol. The interaction of its component parts is intricate yet simple, and the concepts employed are still evident today in modern pistols. Without computers, Browning visualized and crafted a machine that worked to provide our fighting men with an unbeatable personal defense tool. John Taliaferro Thompson put together a design team that came up with a "trench broom," a hand-held machine gun that could empty magazines holding many rounds in seconds, and which would strike fear into the major crime and law enforcement players of the roaring twenties. The reciprocating mechanism of the Thompson submachine gun was ingenious and reliable. The revolving handgun, first brought to commercial fruition by Samuel Colt, gave reliable repeat shots that could be launched by one hand. His early mechanism is copied even today in weapons designed for law enforcement and personal protection. John Cantius Garand, who worked for peanuts as a designer at Springfield Armory prior to WWII, probably did more to help our troops to prevail in that war than any other single man. The U.S. was able to arm most of our troops with semiautomatic rifles in an era when most other nations were still struggling with antiquated bolt actions. Garand's design was simple and robust. I studied it in detail when I was still in high school Jr. ROTC. I memorized the nomenclature of all of the M1's parts and understood the functions of each. I credit the development of my relatively high mechanical aptitude to those days. In the arena of sporting firearms, the mechanisms of lever action rifles, semiauto target pistols and repeating shotguns are fascinating studies in applied mechanical engineering. Take all of these apart, study their component parts and visualize how the parts interact. It's fascinating and gives you insight into the minds of these firearms' inventors.

And some guns (not all, I grant you) are works of art. The flowing lines of a Winchester lever action rifle, the classic finely engraved double-barreled shotgun, the smooth configuration of a Kentucky rifle, the beautiful yet sinister appearance of a Thompson submachine gun; all have esthetic appeal beyond their functional characteristics. That their designers sought to give them gracefulness and eye appeal makes sense, and viewers of today mostly appreciate that. Some of them should be framed just because they are so appealing to view.

I also like firearms for the nostalgia they invoke, particularly when I know the provenance of any particular gun. For example, I own a small pistol carried by an AEF captain in France in World War I. Just touching it gives me a flashback to those times. I own an old Smith & Wesson revolver once owned by my paternal grandfather. It shows years of hard use, and in my mind's eye I can see him wearing the gun in its accompanying shoulder holster as he took the day's receipts from his country store to the bank each evening. I still have my first gun, a Winchester Model 69A bolt action. Holding it takes me back to the first shot I ever fired. It was on a windy day in the desert with my father looking on. I was eleven years old. With repeated practice, I could shoot the centers out of pennies at 30 paces using the same open sights that grace the rifle today. I treasure two S&W Model 28s. One belonged to my father, and one to me. We used to go shooting with them regularly. My dad has been gone now for many years, but when I take his gun out of its original box and hold it, the memories of those good times swim back to me like they were yesterday. I have an Ithaca M1911A1 pistol that I bought just before I entered Army service as a young officer. I had it accurized while on active duty, and carried it as my service weapon by choice because it was 100% reliable with good ammo and would put the shots where I wanted them to go. I also carried it during my National Guard service. I haven't fired it in years, but should I choose to do so, I know it will do the job I intended for it to do all those many years ago. These guns bring back and crystalize many pleasant memories. Sometimes it's good to just sit down and reflect on the times of long ago. Good guns and good memories. That's a hard combination to beat.

I enjoy the history and characteristics of all kinds of guns. I research them, photograph them and write about them for publication. In retirement, I finally have the time and equipment to do this, so the years of study I've devoted to guns is finally paying off to some degree!

And finally, I like guns for the peace of mind they give me. In today's uncertain times, I think it's prudent to be armed when out and about. No big deal. Similarly, I have a fire extinguisher in our home although I don't expect a fire. I carry a gun although I don't expect trouble. Luckily, I live in a free state that encourages and supports firearms ownership. Although no license is required to carry here, I do have a concealed carry permit so that when I travel through states that have reciprocity with mine, I'm covered legally. At home, I'm always within reach of intimidating and effective firepower. On the road and when out walking, I'm similarly armed. I practice regularly and have no doubt that I could prevail if necessary. Without a gun, I'm just an old man – but armed, I'm the equal of anyone who would do me or others harm.

So I like guns. You got a problem with that?

John
 
Last edited:
Register to hide this ad
Back in the early 90s one of my kids came in and said, "Daddy, we found a box of bullets in the ditch". When I asked what they did with them - "Sally took 'em home".

So we go across the street to Sally's house. "Hey, I hear the kids found a box of ammo in the ditch. What kind are they?"

They didn't know. They went and fetched 'em. Almost full box of Remington 45 Ball.

"What you gonna do with 'em?"

Again they didn't know. Call the cops, they guessed.

"Can I have 'em?"

Total shock and stun on their faces. "You've got a GUN?????" :eek:

Well, yeah, that's why I wanted the shells. Box wasn't water-stained, so they hadn't got wet. Probably tossed out of the car by some gang-bangers so they would not get caught with them, but heck, if we called the cops they take 'em, say, "Thank you", and either store 'em forever, or (more likely) some cop would take 'em to the house.

That '37 Brasilian liked 'em fine.

But they were so, "Wow! But you seem like such a NORMAL person". :D
 
John send that in as an article for your local newspaper. That is is the would publish it.

Some newspapers buy opinion editorials. This is too long for a reader letter.

My city newspaper paid me $100 each for two editorials they bought. That was years ago, though. They may pay more now, or just not buy any. Those I've read recently are by politicians or other celebs. But I seldom buy a newspaper now.
 
I get the same with a few of my neighbors from: "Live by the sword die by the sword" argument, to: What do you need a gun for? to "im afraid of guns-you should be too" to waste of money, and other stupid comments. When the neighbor used that Live by the Sword comment and wanted an answer, I said: "I bring guns to sword-fights" and let it go at that. :D
 
And on Christmas Day, after gifts have been opened and the thanks and breakfast were done, you could hear the sound of gifts received echoing through the hills of Tennessee.

There was no panic by the residents, calls to 911. Why?

It was the sound of Freedom.
 
nice post...I agree with every word...I got an M1 Thumb in boot camp and was shooting an AR by the time I went back to NAM the second time...I would like to know why they teach millions of military the proper way to handle firearms and to defends themselves and then when we get out in civilian life we are no longer capable of making decisions about firearms for ourselves...we constantly have to defend our rights to own and bear arms...you can't have it both ways politicians and anti gun zealots...when I am faced with defending myself our my family I am still defending "MY" country in my own little part of the world
 
Good post, and I'd like to see it published to a wider audience. It may be a little long for most daily newspapers, and finding one that would even consider giving it any column space might be difficult simply given the subject.

I'm wondering if a magazine would be a better choice? While getting it in one of the various gun and hunting magazines would be 'preaching to the choir', it might be worth approaching publications with a wider, more general readership first. You can always try another 'target' if turned down.

One thing that can be a concern with some publishers is that they may have restrictions on taking pieces that have been previously published or posted, say on a forum such as this. Just be sure that you're clear on their rules.

Cheers,

Rob
 
Unreasonable fear

Unreasonable fear of guns is our worst enemy. I'd like to see everybody take a gun safety/familiarization class. If they don't like it then, fine. But I'll bet there would be a LOT of converts.
 
Back
Top