mikeruns
Member
Maybe a Glock 27.
That's silly . . .
The whole thing is arguably silly.
However, that's far from the first time some legislators have decided to craft a law that's "silly".
If it's the law, it's the law, until such time as someone has the support to change the law, or a court overturns it.
Sigh.
I would only put 10 in the mag , and have had the mags for years , would any cops even enforce this liberal type law ?????? but 1911 would be my gun if I take it . in stead of MP9 or Glock .
Here, it's about capacity not how many rounds are in the mag. A 12 or 15 round mag with 10 rounds in it would still be in violation of the law. Doesn't matter how long you've had the mag.
Yes, they enforce it. Especially game wardens and troopers. Sheriffs and locals are hit and miss.
New York had a provision of the SAFE Act that restricted magazines to 10rds of ammunition regardless of when it was manufactured or when it was obtained. Meaning if you had what was originally a pre-ban 30rd mag for a AR-15, it had to be pinned or riveted to accept no more then 10rds.
Part of the law that was thrown out by the courts was that it also prohibited possession of a magazine if it is loaded with more than 7rds of ammunition, unless you are at a range.
So if you had a legal 10rd mag for a AR-15 at your home, you legally could not load it with more than 7rds.
Mags over 10 rounds were banned long before the SafeAct. The safe act took away the grandfather clause.
Yes, the high capacity mag would have to be pinned to be legal but must be permanent. It's easier to just get 10 round mags so there's no question.
The 7 rounds in a 10 round mag was deemed unconstitutional in circuit court but the law was never changed. People have still been charged with it but it's usually only in connection to illegal guns.
I think he answered the question perfectly. I'm the same way. I look in the safe and carry what makes me happy that day.
Different strokes for different folks.The whole idea of a "carry rotation" is bad.