Packard
Member
I read in another thread that the writer would draw down to protect his family and himself. I don't think anyone would find fault with that statement.
But what about other innocents? Would you draw on someone threatening a stranger?
I'll give a "for instance":
A young woman is in a bar/nightclub. Her ex-boyfriend shows up. He is not happy that she dumped him. He pulls a knife.
Do you come to her defense? You've never seen the woman or the man before in your life.
I'd like to hear both your response and your reasoning. I'm trying to formulate mine.
To date, my position is that "the strong have an obligation to protect the weak". If you accept that a gun makes you the stronger, then you would defend the woman. Right now that is my position. But I'm listening to others.
But what about other innocents? Would you draw on someone threatening a stranger?
I'll give a "for instance":
A young woman is in a bar/nightclub. Her ex-boyfriend shows up. He is not happy that she dumped him. He pulls a knife.
Do you come to her defense? You've never seen the woman or the man before in your life.
I'd like to hear both your response and your reasoning. I'm trying to formulate mine.
To date, my position is that "the strong have an obligation to protect the weak". If you accept that a gun makes you the stronger, then you would defend the woman. Right now that is my position. But I'm listening to others.