Is it enough: 9mm Luger for self-defense?

Is it enough for self-defense?

  • Yes, it's good enough for primary carry.

    Votes: 262 92.6%
  • Yes, but only with high capacity magazines.

    Votes: 1 0.4%
  • Maybe, but only with +P loads.

    Votes: 5 1.8%
  • Maybe, it's enough for backup at least.

    Votes: 4 1.4%
  • Barely, with high capacity magazines and +P loads.

    Votes: 7 2.5%
  • No, it's not enough to be carried at all.

    Votes: 4 1.4%

  • Total voters
    283
Dirty Harry Callahan,
I can see that you're not going to let this go even though the answer will never change.

Any caliber will do as long as the owner is willing to put in the time. Nothing will be adequate if the owner is not willing to do any work. This is the answer to, "Is caliber X good enough for self-defense" and always will be. You can continue to post these polls, but the result will always be the same.
 
Dirty Harry Callahan,
I can see that you're not going to let this go even though the answer will never change.

Any caliber will do as long as the owner is willing to put in the time. Nothing will be adequate if the owner is not willing to do any work. This is the answer to, "Is caliber X good enough for self-defense" and always will be. You can continue to post these polls, but the result will always be the same.

I agree. But it’s still interesting.
 
One of my colleagues investigated an agency shooting incident, Agent had to shoot an armed defendant. The defendant dropped his weapon and just stood there, not realizing he was shot in chest by agent’s 9mm. The agent told him to lie down as he was shot. The defendant complied and died at the scene, having been shot through the heart. There have been some other incidents in which Adrenalin has been running high and in which well placed shots in the chest have had no apparent effect on an enraged defendant, allowing him to still do harm before succumbing to the wounds.

Having said that, my weapon of choice if concealment is not an issue is a 9mm, high capacity magazine, hollow points and a Crimson Trace laser sight. I can shoot it instinctively and accurately and am completely comfortable knowing that it will function reliably.

If concealment is an issue, my Model 60 with hollow points and Crimson Trace laser sight, in a pocket holster, is my companion.
 
Last edited:
Dirty Harry Callahan,
I can see that you're not going to let this go even though the answer will never change.

Any caliber will do as long as the owner is willing to put in the time. Nothing will be adequate if the owner is not willing to do any work. This is the answer to, "Is caliber X good enough for self-defense" and always will be. You can continue to post these polls, but the result will always be the same.

Fortunately, the purpose of this poll isn't to prove nor disprove the effectiveness of any given caliber, nor anything to that effect.

In fact, if anything I've been hoping since the beginning that the popular vote would be the sensible one that every cartridge polled is adequate, regardless of how many options featuring caveats/conditions are presented, so I'm very satisfied in that regard.

However, this is an evolving poll in which each entry will provide additional options based on the results and feedback of the former.
For example, in polls to come I will likely include an option for those who may feel that the cartridge is overpowered for self-defense against humans.

I'm also curious to see if folks will begin voting against certain cartridges, particularly the "9mm is just as good *hooks arm* as .40/.45!" crowd. Not to mention how folks will respond to more niche cartridges like .38 Super, .357 SIG, and 5.7x28 FN.

Rest assured, if folks continue voting for the exact same opinion that the cartridge is enough for primary carry, regardless of caveats, conditions, and alternative options, then I will be very pleased by the enduring sensibility of the userbase when presented with questions that usually prompt endlessly debates which never reach a satisfactory conclusion in the confines of an environment in which such arguing is discouraged.
 
Why does everyone think that this is a Caliber Wars thread?

Honestly, I have two separate statements in bold and colorful text in the OP that this isn't a caliber debate thread, yet folks keep acting like it is even though nobody in the entire thread is treating it as such.

Because if you dont like their caliber, its a caliber war,
 
Way back in the day I tried to shoot drain holes in the bottom of a 55 gallon drum with a .45 ACP. No bueno. I switched to a 9mm Luger and it went through like a hot knife through butter.

You're saying a .45acp won't penetrate the bottom of a 55-gallon drum? Pffft! Putting it as politely as I can, and as a dedicated .45acp shooter, I have to disagree.

In my opinion, the only way a .45 wouldn't shoot holes in a 55-gallon drum would be if you missed the drum completely, or you were trying to use a gun that didn't work.
confused0042.gif
 
You're saying a .45acp won't penetrate the bottom of a 55-gallon drum? Pffft! Putting it as politely as I can, and as a dedicated .45acp shooter, I have to disagree.

In my opinion, the only way a .45 wouldn't shoot holes in a 55-gallon drum would be if you missed the drum completely, or you were trying to use a gun that didn't work.
confused0042.gif

I've got to side with BB57 on this. I tried two rounds of Winchester white box 230 grains on the bottom of a 55 gallon drum to be used as a burn barrel. Both rounds bounced off the bottom. Wound up putting the holes in the side about an inch off bottom.
 
I think 9mm is AWESOME!

With so many new women shooters we need a good caliber for the little ladies to shoot!! :)

The 9mm is the Sportster of calibers, Anything with a .4 and above is the big twin of calibers. Sportsters are girls bikes.

Just kidding, Sportsters are great bikes for anybody.
 
9mm is only as good as the person pulling the trigger. Shot placement is everything---period.
Jim
 
Quality 230gr 45 ACP will penetrate a 55 gallon drum, sides or bottom (a little iffy if you hit the rolled side marks first, but that's aiming). Done that. So will a modern 147gr 9mm. 124's and 115's, maybe not as easily. What will stop 230gr 45's and 147gr 9's? A four inch thick brick wall. Seen that, too.
 
You're saying a .45acp won't penetrate the bottom of a 55-gallon drum? Pffft! Putting it as politely as I can, and as a dedicated .45acp shooter, I have to disagree.

In my opinion, the only way a .45 wouldn't shoot holes in a 55-gallon drum would be if you missed the drum completely, or you were trying to use a gun that didn't work.
confused0042.gif

I remember in the early 80's when I purchased my first .45 ACP caliber gun, a Colt Series 70. I took it out to my uncle's farm. Out back among the trees was an early 50's Pontiac that I figured would make a good target. I squared up along side it, and let fly at the door, thinking it would be quite possible that I'd blow the whole door off. Not quite. I was using 230 grain FMJ RN ammo.

Only one bullet penetrated the door. A 9mm Luger zipped right through (115 grain FMJ RN ammo).
 
All inanimate object comparisons......

Shooting cinder blocks, old cars, new cars, steel appliances. etc. is all very interesting but have no bearing at all on the effectiveness of a a round on the human organism in a stressful situation.
 
Back
Top