K 38 Questions

Joined
Mar 12, 2021
Messages
4
Reaction score
7
I just bought a K 38 masterpiece and according to the S&W blue book the serial number puts it into the year 1949. A buddy of mine who has more experience and knowledge had some questions regarding if that matches the way it should based on how the gun looks. The biggest reason for his concern is the wide rib along the top of the barrel (being a later design), and that the cylinder looks like a newer cylinder. The S/N on the bottom of the frame, the cylinder and under the barrel where the spindle sits when closed match up with each other. The S/N is K 77128 and it is a five screw
Thank you for taking the time to read and possibly help
 

Attachments

  • 20220214_161025.jpg
    20220214_161025.jpg
    74.9 KB · Views: 157
  • 20220214_161048.jpg
    20220214_161048.jpg
    42 KB · Views: 126
  • 20220214_161057.jpg
    20220214_161057.jpg
    65.3 KB · Views: 121
  • 20220214_161119.jpg
    20220214_161119.jpg
    84.3 KB · Views: 115
  • 20220214_161129.jpg
    20220214_161129.jpg
    55.9 KB · Views: 110
Last edited:
Register to hide this ad
According to the SCSW 4th edition, your pistol was made in 1949, and S&W began using the heavy barrel (wide rib) the same year. If it were mine, I'd call it correct and enjoy it.
 
The first K-38 Heavy Masterpiece (wide rib) carried serial number K66222 and it shipped on August 19, 1948.

Your K77128 probably shipped in 1949. I show four K-38s in the K757xxx range that shipped in the spring of 1949 (two in April, one in May, one in June). I own one of them that shipped in April.

K76068 (tapered barrel) shipped in May, 1949; K76490 shipped in July, 1949. That one is a Heavy Masterpiece. The four mentioned in the previous paragraph all have the tapered barrel. Heavy Masterpiece K78822 shipped in November, 1949.

So, in 1948, 1949, 1950, both style barrels were available and were shipped. The last of the tapered barrels were used up in 1952.
 
I have one numbered about 11,000 below yours with all “skinny” parts (barrel, hammer and trigger). Your target model really makes the blood in my amphibian aorta race! Great find. :)

Froggie
 
Do you guys have any opinion on what you would call this percentage wise? Also do you guys think its reblued?
 

Attachments

  • 20220214_161109.jpg
    20220214_161109.jpg
    93.6 KB · Views: 37
  • 20220214_161025.jpg
    20220214_161025.jpg
    75.5 KB · Views: 33
Looks like original bluing to me, nice soft satin blue, correct for that vintage. Hard to say with 100% certainty from the pics but the numbers stamped on the underside of the barrel in the first post have not been polished, they look nice and crisp. I vote original bluing.
 
Do you guys have any opinion on what you would call this percentage wise? Also do you guys think its reblued?

Hard to assess the percentage of the finish from those two pics, but I don't see anything that makes me suspect it's been refinished. How does it look under the grips? I ask because rubber grips like those have a bad reputation for trapping moisture and causing rust. Even if there's no rust under them, they often leave marks on the finish that are hard to get rid of.

Mark
 
Agree the finish is original.

Ditch the Goodyear grips, put some nice walnut on it and you will have a fine looking revolver. :)

I have a set of aftermarket wood grips. Im looking for a set of magna grips with the screw hole.
 
Correct grips would be 'sharp shouldered Magnas'. They should have a diamond around the screw.
 
Last edited:
Correct grips would be 'sharp shouldered Magnas.
Yes.

Nerdsonice

What MrG5122 is referring to can be seen on the bottom revolver in this picture:
jp-ak-albums-miscellaneous-revolvers-picture8883-postwar-m-p-x2.jpg

The shoulder drops off sharply toward the frame. It isn't tapered like the diamond Magna stocks used after 1952.

The upper gun is wearing the prewar style. It also has the sharp shoulder but the checking pattern is larger.
 
Back
Top