Les Baer 1911's who knows them?

How to Test Your "Match Grade" 1911 for Proper Barrel Fit and Lock-Up

OK, here's a couple of tests to do on your Baer pistols to determine if the barrel was properly fit and lock-up properly achieved.

1. With the slide off the gun, remove the guide rod, spring, plug, and slide stop pin, but leave the bushing in place. Turn the slide upside down. Now, with the barrel all the way to the rear (emulating the position of the assembled gun when it is battery), press down on the barrel in the area of the bottom barrel lugs, and release the pressure. Does the barrel rebound just slightly when you release the pressure? If it does, you've got a "sprung barrel," which is an indication of a poor barrel to bushing fit.

2. While you have the gun in this position, look to see if you can see daylight on either side of the barrel hood, and/or at the rear, where the hood is supposed to contact the breech face. You should see NO daylight in any of those three locations. The rear of the barrel hood should make full contact across its entire width with the breech face.

3. The barrel OD should exactly equal the bushing ID. How is this possible? Well, there should be relief cuts at the top rear and bottom front of the bushing so that the barrel can cam downward and unlock from the slide during recoil. Having looked at several Baer guns up close, I have found that the bushings appear to have been reamed to a generic size, so the fit is not as it should be. The bushing should have that 1° camming relief cut to permit proper unlocking and the tight fit you get when the barrel OD equals the bushing ID. Baer guns don't.

4. Other than holding the slide and frame together, the slide stop pin's only proper function is to serve as the pivot for the barrel link. I've noticed that Baer guns have the bottom barrel lug cut so as to wedge the slide stop pin, the barrel, and the link together. That's not right either.

5. Then there is the matter of the slide to frame fit. With the barrel, bushing, slide stop, spring, plug, and guide rod out of the slide (just the naked slide), position it on the frame to emulate the position the slide is supposed to be in when it is in battery. Can you detect any movement of the slide on the frame in this position, either up and down or side to side, when you try to jiggle it? There should be none. Zero.

6. If you have the proper micrometer, measure the OD of the slide stop pin, and then tell me what that measurement is. I'll bet I have a surprise for you.

One more thing. The target Joni Lynn posted is very impressive. I have no way of contesting or vouching for its probity. I'd like to know the exact dimensions (OD) of that group. Most of all, I'd like to see that group duplicated out of a Ransom rest at 50 yards. I have heard stories that these groups are not always fired at 50 yards, but rather than post what may be only misinformed gossip, I would simply repeat that I would like to see that group duplicated out of a Ransom rest at 50 yards. If the pistol can produce three consecutive 10-shot groups like that I'll offer to buy it for $5,000 and use it in the centerfire match.

There's another company in Illinois whose "match grade" pistols seem to suffer from the same kind of problems, so Baer is not unique in this regard.

I know this is controversial. My intention is not to question the judgment of the owners involved. Just let me say that I gained this knowledge the hard way. In my opinion, there is no substitute for a hand built full custom match pistol, wherein the pistol smith fits every single part by hand, and uses techniques perfected by outfits like the Marine Corps WTB or the Army AMU. These "semi-customs" cost the same, but, again in my experience, they aren't the same.

One last point: when you call Baer, can you talk to the one man who built the gun? Do you even know his name? Didn't think so. That, more than anything else, should tell you something.


Bullseye
 
Last edited:
I've seen you post that target before - and it is impressive! I am more curious about what that gun will do in your hands. Have you shot any targets you could share with us - your "best effort" sort, not just run of the mill ones?

I believe Baer claims all the guns are shot by hand, by him (Les Baer), from a rest - not a machine rest. I may be mistaken about that. I have never really gotten a "No, a machine rest is not used" answer.

Either way, I can't imagine the man has time to shoot every single gun... :confused:

Well, I got the gun and had just barely sighted it in when the weather headed towards fall and it got put away for the winter.
So far this year I've been in 3 different foot casts, braces, bandages, crutches, wheelchair, walking boot and still can't get around very well. I doubt I get to do any shooting this year. So far this year is a nightmare for me.
What shooting I did accomplish the gun didn't like the Armscor 38 Super ammo and had a lot of flyers, the handloads shot quite well though. I like to pound on my own steel plate rack at 40 to 50 yards off hand.
Les does shoot every gun by hand but the ones with the 1.5" option also get shot in a machine rest.
 
Last edited:
SW CQB45, before you buy, standby and let's see what Bullseye 2620 says. I can give you some additional info/opinions off-board, if you would like it. The PII set up as you describe might suit you better without the extra expense of the 1.5-inch option.

M29since14, no worries....no $$$$$$$ right now.

My goal is to collect the $$$ for the following criteria
1911
5"
9mm
adjustable rear (.110" notch)
.110" front sight serrated post
very accurate
reliable
production catalogued item
Mag well
3.5#+ trigger
for NRA LEO matches

I am looking at
S/A PX9132LP
STI Trojan
Les Baer PII
Dan Wesson (no longer made)
 
SW CQB45, for what you want to do, a 9x19 PII sounds like a nice gun, but I would stay away from the 1.5-inch option. JMHO - and worth every cent it cost. :)

This is off the beaten path, but have you considered a SIG X5 or X6? These are very nicely made guns and should be fully up to the accuracy requirements, but of course I have no idea whether they are legal in your matches. If you are concerned about the trigger, these guns have fully adjustable triggers and are single-action. Very comfortable in my (long and thin) hands. You might look at one before you buy a 9mm 1911. Unlike the .38 Super, the 9x19 cartridge is not really well suited to the 1911.

Joni Lynn, sorry to hear of your difficulties. I hope whatever they may be they are resolved quickly. When you do get a chance to sit down and shoot that gun from a rest, I would like to hear what you come up with. If this thread should devolve into an anti-Les Baer food fight (which I hope it does not), I would appreciate a PM. Thanks, and get better.
 
Last edited:
Unlike the .38 Super, the 9x19 cartridge is not really well suited to the 1911. . .If this thread should devolve into an anti-Les Baer food fight (which I hope it does not), I would appreciate a PM. Thanks, and get better.

I'm not sure that the 9 x 19 cartridge is not well-suited to the 1911 platform. I think it has much more to do with who is building the pistol and how they build it. Here's a 9 x 19 1911 built by David Sams for bullseye centerfire competition. The Ransom rest test groups were all just over one inch:

Sams Custom Gunworks LLC

Please, let me make it clear that I am not "anti-Baer." I just think that people ought to know how Baer builds his guns and what the differences are between those pistols and true custom builds done by real experts -- men who have devoted their entire adult lives to building these pistols for competitive military teams and special operations groups, one at a time, and not on a production line.

And, to address the question, "if it shoots tight groups, who cares how it was put together?" consider that if the resulting mechanics and geometry depart from John Browning's orginal design, wear and tear will be accelerated, and in some cases, the gun will be much more likely to be subject to catastrophic failure.


Bullseye
 
Last edited:
I'm not sure that the 9 x 19 cartridge is not well-suited to the 1911 platform...

My comment was only a reference to the cartridge OAL/magazine issue. The 1911 is designed to operate with a longer cartridge, but I understand that modern magazines have improved and that this is not so much the issue it once was.
 
Bullseye, QUESTION

if you had to buy a production (catalogued) 1911 to utilize for NRA LEO Service Matches and the rules now state it can have an adjustable rear sight

what would you go with?

most competitors are putting tall front sights for 50 yd neck holds

I am sure you know this, but most will take a stock production gun and accurize it with match barrels, accurails, etc. I think this is stretching it, but I want to follow the letter of the rules.

if Baer is worth the money for a production model, then I need to start saving my coin.
 
Last edited:
SW CQB45, for what you want to do, a 9x19 PII sounds like a nice gun, but I would stay away from the 1.5-inch option. JMHO - and worth every cent it cost. :)

This is off the beaten path, but have you considered a SIG X5 or X6? These are very nicely made guns and should be fully up to the accuracy requirements, but of course I have no idea whether they are legal in your matches. If you are concerned about the trigger, these guns have fully adjustable triggers and are single-action. Very comfortable in my (long and thin) hands. You might look at one before you buy a 9mm 1911. QUOTE]

M29, I want to stick with the 1911 platform since that is what I carry on duty, so my play time is actually training for my duty carry.

I am having a difficult time being consistant with my production "NINA". It might be that I have not settled on a certain round and my gun does not like 115s. I can hit the mark but at extended distances beyond 15, my grouping goes left with 115s. I shoot 124/147 factory....my groups return to center. it baffles me. thinking about going to 45acp for production model.
 
Last edited:
Bullseye, QUESTION

if you had to buy a production (catalogued) 1911 to utilize for NRA LEO Service Matches and the rules now state it can have an adjustable rear sight

what would you go with?

most competitors are putting tall front sights for 50 yd neck holds

I am sure you know this, but most will take a stock production gun and accurize it with match barrels, accurails, etc. I think this is stretching it, but I want to follow the letter of the rules.

if Baer is worth the money for a production model, then I need to start saving my coin.

SW CQB 45,

Are you able to send me the complete rules governing the requirements for the pistols used in these competitions, or, send me a link, please?

I know what there is to know about the requirements for bullseye and hardball guns, but I am unfamiliar with your discipline and do not want to give advice based on my ignorance.

Also, I need to know the cost to you of acquiring the Baer model you are considering.

Glad to help a competitive shooter, I am.


Bullseye
 
I chose 9mm for lower recoil and faster recovery of the sights plus cheaper to shoot. (thanks in advance for any assistance)

http://www.nrahq.org/law/competitions/ppc/ppcrules.pdf

Rule 3.8 Stock Semi-Automatic Pistol: Factory manufactured
(catalog item), center-fire semi-automatic pistol capable of
chambering and firing .35 caliber or larger ammunition, or FN
5.7 x 28 caliber ammunition. All double action semi-automatic
pistols must fire the first shot of every stage double action.
Trigger pull not less than 3.5 pounds single or double action.

Allowed:
1. Maximum barrel length of 5.5 inches.
2. Any accessories, parts, and components which are
manufactured to duplicate, in materials and dimensions,
the original as offered by the manufacturer.
3. Replacement of service type sights with luminescent, or
fiber optic service sights.
4. Maximum sight radius of 7.5 inches.
5. Finger groove and slip on grips.
6. Magazine bumper pad.
7. Extended magazine well funnel.

Prohibited:
1. Adjustable front sight.
2. Thumb rest.
3. Grips/stocks that are flared at the base.
4. Tape on the grips/stocks.
5. Any substance that results in a sticky surface to the
grips/stocks or hand.
6. Full-length Bo-mar type ribs on the slide.
7. Weighted grips or grip panels.
8. Trigger shoes.
 
I very carefully read the rules concerning modification of stock semi-automatics for PPC, and as I interpret them, the kind of modifications my previous posts suggest -- even to an otherwise legal pistol -- are not permitted:

From Section 3.7: "The only modification or replacement part allowed is the magazine bumper pad. All double action semi-automatic pistols must fire the first shot of every stage double action."

And further: "In determining whether a specific firearm meets the spirit and intent as well as the letter of this Rule, it should be remembered that this is meant to be a totally stock police duty firearm such as would be issued to a new recruit in the academy. IT IS NOT A COMPETITION FIREARM. This firearm is designed to be used in conjunction with the NRA Stock Semi-Automatic Pistol Course of Fire, the purpose of which is to encourage police officers to participate in competitive shooting using their standard-issue firearm without having to incur the cost of additional or specialized firearms."

Thus, a totally custom-built pistol, such as I use in bullseye competition, is not allowed. Moreover, I do not think it would be legal to take a Baer gun and have it re-worked since, at a minimum, that would involve changing out the barrel and barrel bushing.

All said then, if the use is to be for PPC, the Baer may be your best choice, although as previously stated, I have significant problems with the way in which these pistols are assembled. Just make sure before you lay out your money that the specific model is catalogued and that at least 1,000 have been manufactured, since Rule 3.7 clearly states that the pistol is to be "mass produced."

If someone here knows something I don't, e.g., that a match barrel and bushing may be fitted aftermarket, or the slide to frame fit may be improved aftermarket, please post. PPC is not my discipline and I am always interested in learning things I do not already know.


Bullseye
 
Last edited:
Uh oh... :rolleyes: I can't see any department issuing Les Baer Premier IIs, so maybe SW CQB45 had better go looking for a good P226. That gun is probably the most accurate of the production 9s that I can think of, though nothing special, from what I have seen. If you're going to follow the intent of the rules, I don't see how a Les Baer or an X5/X6 is going to make it past the first referee. "NOT a competition firearm" pretty thoroughly assures that. :D

But of course what the rules say and what is actually going on can be (usually is) two different things. :o
 
For ~$1800? Sign me up!

OK, I have. Send me your check. ;)

I checked this today with two very respected bullseye pistolsmiths I know, and they both said, that if you supply a clean 1911-A1, either a SA or a Colt Series 70, they will turn it into a match grade gun capable of X-ring accuracy at 50 yards, for $1,200-$1,400. With the cost of the pistol included, that should work out to about $1,800-$2,000.

This would include properly fitting (per my previous post) a match Bar-sto or Kart barrel and bushing, Bo-mar style front and rear sights, Videcki trigger and 3-1/2 lb. trigger job, 20 lpi hand checkering on the front strap and mainspring housing, installation of oversize sear and hammer pins, hand-fitting of the slide to frame, refinishing, test-firing for function and accuracy (30 consecutive shots at 50 yards), etc.

Y'all just gotta know the right people.


Bullseye
 
Last edited:
Back
Top