Let's see some 4" 27s

stevieboy

Member
Joined
Apr 27, 2008
Messages
1,450
Reaction score
40
Location
Tucson, Arizona
99% of the short barrel 27s that I see posted on this forum are 3.5" guns. The four-inchers are very much in the minority.

I have one, it's a 27-3. I know it's not a collector's piece. It's not pinned and it's not recessed. But, it has that great 27 blued finish and it is as fine a shooting piece as I own. Mine gets a diet of exclusively magnum rounds and it shoots them like a laser. The Pachmayr grips attest to its status as a shooter.

So, let's see yours.
 

Attachments

  • N-frames 004.jpg
    N-frames 004.jpg
    64.6 KB · Views: 69
Register to hide this ad
Only have one 4" Model 27,
A transitional dash 2 Nickel with recessed chambers but an unpinned barrel.
Guess they ran out of barrel pins that day.
CIMG6234.jpg
 
I'm beginning to get the feeling based on the entirely unscientific sample that's been posted thus far that the majority of 4" 27-2s are nickel and that Smith began making the 4" blued guns with the introduction of the 27-3.

Why? What would motivate Smith to make their P/R guns through the 27-2 as four inchers in nickel? Why would it start making 4" guns in quantity with the -3 when, for decades, their standard barrel length for the short barrel 27s was 3.5"? Anyone hazard a guess? I'm honestly clueless as to this. I don't really see what 1/2" means in in terms of performance. Both guns more or less fit the same holster, their sight radii are essentially the same. So why spend decades making the trademark 3.5" barrel length and then, with the -3, start producing the guns as 4-inchers in blue? I'm puzzled and I'd sure like to hear some opinions.
 
Here's my blued model 27-3.
 
Last edited:

Latest posts

Back
Top