Let's talk Derringers

I can keep both shots from my F.I.E. 38spl on a paper plate with whatever i have put in it, at about ten yards. Nice to know if I am ever attacked by a rouge paper plate. Better than a harsh word and a mean look but not as nice as a cobra gunship. I find a pocket knife more useful every day than any ccw that I have ever carried.

So then, you're the guy who'll have a knife at a gunfight...brilliant!
 
Nice to know if I am ever attacked by a rouge paper plate. Better than a harsh word and a mean look but not as nice as a cobra gunship. I find a pocket knife more useful every day than any ccw that I have ever carried.

Number of confrontations I have resolved with harsh words: four or five.

Number of confrontations I have resolved with firearms: zero.

Just sayin'.
 
Guess there's no need to carry a firearm for protection when your mouth is your weapon. If that worked for everyone, we wouldn't need a Second Amendment.
 
Words without a gun in hand are a big gamble.

“Wasn’t planning on killing anything but fish tonight”, were my words when some drunk kids threw beer cans and a chain at me from a moving car, while I was bridge fishing at Channel 5 decades ago, then stopped their car about 50 feet away from me and came at me.

They hesitated when I shouted those words but did not leave until I raised the M59 that was already in my hand.... the HS 22Mag was in my tackle box.

I had recently switched to a new M59 after a boatload of people washed up on shore and I only had my Colt GM... wasn’t so much the added rounds but flatter shooting and better to damage/loose in a salty slimy environment.
 
Last edited:
Grats on missing the point, guys.

Plain English: The ability to de-escalate situations verbally has been useful to me more times than the gun I was carrying for all but one or two of those situations. Ask any real cop--no two-year reservist wannabe--and you'll find that verbal techniques are used far more frequently than a gun in their profession.

Ranger514 said:
Guess there's no need to carry a firearm for protection when your mouth is your weapon. If that worked for everyone, we wouldn't need a Second Amendment.

The Second Amendment doesn't protect conceal carry, and has nothing to do with self-defense. Don't tie the thing to any sort of "practical usage", because it invariably results in our rights being weakened:

You: "The Second Amendment is about self defense!"

Them: "Who needs an AR-15 with a threaded barrel and a 30-round magazine for self-defense? Who needs a suppressor for self-defense?"

We have a right to own these things, and there is no reason for us to not enjoy these rights. Plain and simple.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top