This whole topic is fascinating to me. Alpo... I think I remember when you and Driftwood Johnson would post stuff like this all the time over on the SASS Wire. Also, remember when Driftwood would state that the 44-40 was a much better black powder cartridge than the .45LC... cause the case above the shoulder would expand and was more inclined to decrease powder "blow-back" into the rifle receiver.
Hey 33 Jay Man... I still have a '73 Short Rifle in .38/357... the top one (both were spankin' new in this pic). Sold the bottom rifle to a fella who immediately replaced the finish...
![]()
In the 19th Century they didn't go for the 45 Colt in rifles. The small rim, combined with the effect of black powder fouling, made for chancy extraction. And back then, these weren't toys, but rifles on which your life may have depended. Better safe than sorry, so they didn't make them in 45 Colt.
All of my lever guns are Marlins from .22 to .45-70 oh, and uh .410 lever gun.Never been sorry with any one of them . Nick
Colt Mfg. tried the .45LC by developing the Burgess... the allure of using the same cartridge in both rifle and handgun was great. However... you are correct... that small rim stopped Colt... and they stuck with the .44WCF for the limited-run Burgess. Hear-tell shortly after the Burgess... Winchester paid Colt a visit with a couple of prototype handguns... and they ended up with a handshake. Colt stuck to handguns... Winchester stuck to rifles.
Item of note: Colt developed the Frontier Six-Shooter in '79 to accompany the Winchesters.
There is a lot more to it than that... but that's as concise as I can make it.
I've heard of the "Gentleman's Agreement" between Winchester and a pistol maker, but I heard it was Smith, not Colt. And while Smith did market Husqvarna rifles in the latter half of the 20th Century, aside from those early revolving rifles, I don't Smith ever made rifles.
How did you mount the tomahawk on the rifle?![]()
How did you mount the tomahawk on the rifle?![]()