The famous 1920's explorer/archaeologist Roy Chapman Andrews is widely considered the inspiration for the Indiana Jones character. In various pictures he is shown carrying what appears to be a Colt Official Police, Could be a Smith, can't really tell .He use the gun with good effect several times, including the time he shot himself in the thigh when unlimbering it when confronted by some banditos . His good friend William Morden owned a RM that has been discussed on a earlier thread on this forum, does anyone have any information on Chapman's pistol? Who has it ? Was it a Colt or Smith ? Regards, Bart
Read my post above, which crossed with yours in reply. Andrews definitely stated on numerous occcasions in his books, which I own, that he used Colt .38 revolvers. I have a sharp photo of him in the Gobi Desert, in which the handle of the gun is very visible. It's almost surely an Army Special or Official Police, which was a later name for the same model. The name changed in 1926, but unless he bought a new gun then (very possible, for he loved guns and was an enthusiastic hunter), it was an Army Special, NOT to be confused with the older New Army in .38 Long Colt. It might be an Officers Model target version, but I think that less likely.
I read that some guy in Dallas last had one of his .38's. I may check this later in, "Dragon Hunter", a fairly recent biography of Andrews. If you don't own it, look for a copy. His own books are also thrilling, and were very well written. He often mentioned his various firearms.
His Savage was a M-1920 bolt action, not the more widely known M-99, although he may have had one of them, too. And he liked the 6.5mm and 9mm Mannlicher-Schoenauer rifles. Had a Winchester auto rifle for the .22WRF round, with which he sometimes shot savage Mongol dogs.
He did kill a couple of bandits, firing his Colt .38 from his Dodge car as they charged one another.
You may also want to check on Wendell Phillips, who sort of repeated Andrews's quests in Arabia, in the 1950's. He too, used Savage rifles and Colt handguns.
I have somewhere some very sharp 8X10 B&W prints of Andrews with his guns, obtained years ago from the American Museum of Natural History. They were taken by the expedition's official photographer. I meant to write an article on him and his guns, but the Museum wanted too much for reproduction rights. (Gun magazines pay only a few hundred dollars.) At least one of these photos is in, "Dragon Hunter", but the author is a former museum staffer, who may have gotten a favorable deal on the pics. And his book publisher was probably willing to pay more to reproduce them. The Savage M-20 in .250 and the Colt .38 in an Audley holster were very sharp in the original photos. Roy usually wore his gun pretty low on the hip.
Andrews was also an enthusiastic shotgunner, even after he retired from the Museum (he was the Director) and bought land where he could hunt. But I don't know which shotguns he used. A photo from his time in Korea shows an unknown double shotgun and a lever-action Winchester rifle. If memory serves, it was either an M-1876 or 1886. It should have been the latter, and he knew guns! I suspect it was a heavy caliber, in Winchester terms. He hunted tigers there!
By the way, his last name was Andrews. Chapman was his MIDDLE name. You may wish to correct your post.
He was a fascinating man. Today's liberal, usually very PC, scientists pale by comparison. But I've met and talked briefly with Dr. Donald Johanson, whose expeditions found the celebrated "Lucy" skeleton of an Australopithicine. He was pretty cordial, if a little distracted by the size of the audience for his lecture, and by some death threats from people who don't believe in evolution. The SMU campus police (they're sworn officers, not guards) were all over the audatorium that evening.
Keep in mind that these modern scientists are not only operating under very different political conditions, they are drawn from a different academic atmosphere than were Andrews and Phillips.
I've also met Jane Goodall, about whom the less said, the better. I found her to be very condescending. Johanson is a far more effective and entertaining speaker, although both probably suffer tours and write books primarily to raise funds for their work.
T-Star