Losing vs. Loosing

:eek::eek::eek:

I have just seen and properly read the title to one of my posts.

I am the cause of this thread.

:rolleyes::confused::(

I didn't know if you had posted the thread before or after this one was started. I thought maybe you had started the other thread after this one to kind of stick your tongue out at us grammar freaks.:eek::p
 
Let's pretend we are watching the old I Love Lucy Show, if both main characters were to become unbalanced in an episode Lucy would lose her mind Ricky would loose his. Just listen.
 
I always thought you just added a superfluous u to a word to make it UK english....

louse colour labour :-)
Louse is the accepted spelling in the US when you just have one. More than one then you have lice. Just like mouse and mice.

If you go back far enough in American English (or British English for that matter), people just spelled words they way they thought they should be spelled. In America, Webster came along and tried to simplify and standardize American spelling.
So he took out the u from colour, labour, etc. But if you took the u out of louse you would have a completely different word.
 
I know the world of the internet hates posters who question grammar.

But why is "loosing" used so often when what is meant is "losing"? From "loosing" weight to "loosing" things.

I've visited three different types of forums this morning, guns, cars, and fountain pens, and like almost every day, I see these words misused.

I almost never see the word "losing" used, and I'm honestly just confused as to why. I have auto correct turned off on all my devices, as I'm perfectly capable of making errors all by myself.

I guess my question is why does this happen? Do auto progrms finish the word when typing? Am I in the wrong universe, or an alternative dimension?

Loosing is just a slower way of losing. Their is always an explanation.
 
Back
Top