Roses are reddish, violets are blueish, . . .If Peter had had a US cavalry-issued SAA revolver instead if a sword, we'd all be wearing yamakas today.
Roses are reddish, violets are blueish, . . .If Peter had had a US cavalry-issued SAA revolver instead if a sword, we'd all be wearing yamakas today.
I have just seen and properly read the title to one of my posts.
I am the cause of this thread.
![]()
If Peter had had a US cavalry-issued SAA revolver instead if a sword, we'd all be wearing yamakas today.
The ones that get to me are brake and break and there and their. They apply the breaks on there car instead off applying the brakes on their car.![]()
I always thought you just added a superfluous u to a word to make it UK english....
louse colour labour![]()
Louse is the accepted spelling in the US when you just have one. More than one then you have lice. Just like mouse and mice.I always thought you just added a superfluous u to a word to make it UK english....
louse colour labour![]()
Sure would - you would completely loose the meaning.But if you took the u out of louse you would have a completely different word.
"Supposably" is prolly ok, loosely speaking.Let's try this:
"supposedly" or "supposably"? Which one is correct? Or are they both correct?
I know the world of the internet hates posters who question grammar.
But why is "loosing" used so often when what is meant is "losing"? From "loosing" weight to "loosing" things.
I've visited three different types of forums this morning, guns, cars, and fountain pens, and like almost every day, I see these words misused.
I almost never see the word "losing" used, and I'm honestly just confused as to why. I have auto correct turned off on all my devices, as I'm perfectly capable of making errors all by myself.
I guess my question is why does this happen? Do auto progrms finish the word when typing? Am I in the wrong universe, or an alternative dimension?
I always thought you just added a superfluous u to a word to make it UK english....