Louisiana Becomes First State to Authorize Local Law Enforcement to Neutralize Dangerous Drones

What was that Ithaca 10 Gauge they introduced back in the 70’s? (I made the mistake ONCE of shooting a friends—it was the riot gun model, I think it was called the “Roadblocker” or something along those lines. That had to be near-on 50 years ago and my shoulder still hurts!).

Anyway, they need to reintroduce it as the DRONE BUSTER!
 
This is undoubtedly true, but haven't state marijuana laws set a precedent of overriding federal law?

Not to mention the sanctuary city / state garbage.
Negative! Possession and use is still against Federal law. You will be arrested if you attempt to board an aircraft or cruise ship with marijuana, and you cannot legally purchase a firearm if you use it. A medical MJ permit is not recognized by the feds, and is primarily facie evidence of regular use.
 
The FAA taking any interest in the destruction of a menacing drone over private, residential property - and not in controlled airspace - seems like yet another addition to the already long list of federal government over-reach items. Of course it’s never such a good idea to fire into the air, but number 7-1/2 or smaller shot shouldn’t be much worse than some pheasant hunters I’ve been around. 😏
 
The FAA taking any interest in the destruction of a menacing drone over private, residential property - and not in controlled airspace - seems like yet another addition to the already long list of federal government over-reach items. Of course it’s never such a good idea to fire into the air, but number 7-1/2 or smaller shot shouldn’t be much worse than some pheasant hunters I’ve been around. 😏
President Trump issued an Executive Order that supercharged drone operations two weeks ago.

The time has come to accelerate testing and to enable routine drone operations, scale up domestic production, and expand the export of trusted, American-manufactured drone technologies to global markets.

 
Might come into conflict with FAA regulations, which treat drones no differently than passenger-carrying aircraft. Certainly, no state law that said "our officers can shoot down an airplane if they think it is a threat" would stand up to a legal challenge.

It will be interesting to see how this plays out.
Indeed.

Posted: Feb 16, 2016 / 06:30 PM CST

Updated: Feb 16, 2016 / 06:30 PM CST
SHARE
David Leroy Dickenson, 39, will spend more than six years in federal prison. He must also pay the owner of the plane $17,000 for the damage. It happened in December of 2014 when the plane was spreading herbicide on a field near Miller. Dickenson plead guilty to destruction of an airplane in September 2015. Court documents say that Dickenson was angry that the noise was keeping him from sleeping and fired at the airplane with a 20 gauge shotgun. https://www.fourstateshomepage.com/news/miller-man-pleads-guilty-to-destruction-of-an-airplane/
 
It's a shame that some drone operators are inconsiderate, nosy and even dangerous. People were flying drones around the Golden Gate bridge and somebody was whining, "How can a drone hurt a CAR?". Try hitting a 3 lb drone at 45 mph and see.
 
Back
Top