I'm pretty sure the style of trigger guard you are referring to is the stamped type vs the milled type. The stamped guard started being used on the Garand in late 1943 or early 44 and predates the Korean conflict.
M-1 Garand
- Thread starter andy52
- Start date
I'm pretty sure the style of trigger guard you are referring to is the stamped type vs the milled type. The stamped guard started being used on the Garand in late 1943 or early 44 and predates the Korean conflict.
vonn
US Veteran
M1 is still an awesome rifle that delivers a punch!
Frank46
US Veteran
Mine is 1943 dated according to the serial number. Was a Blue Sky bring back from South Korea. I also did put a Boyds stock set on it and just stuck the Korean stock in the closet. Seems yo be made of either Birch or beech.Stripped it down to bare wood. Used an oil stain and it looked like ****. Resanded and this time I used an alcohol stain. Brought out all the grain patterns both the highlights. 1st time I shot that M1 Garand you should have heard all the ooo's and ahhhh's thats how good it looks. The only problem is someone sanded the flats on the stock where the flats on the triggerguard sit and so I made somebrass shims to take the place of the missing wood. Mine also came with remington National match op od. Barrel is getting a little worn in the tooth so I may send it out to get a new barrel.One of the few rifles I can still shoot with the iron sights. I'm 72 so I need all the help I can get. Frank
Mine started out as a WW II rifle, but was evidently sent to South Korea as part of a military aid program. Re-imported in the late 1980's by Blue Sky. Mine has a very light re-import stamp, but the stock lacked any markings, some of the internals and the barrel had been replaced, so not an original piece.
I recrowned the barrel and that improved accuracy a bit, then glass bedded and refinished the stock, replaced the rear aperture with a national match aperture and trued the front sight. I did not shoot it a whole lot, but with premium ammo it is capable of excellent accuracy.
I recrowned the barrel and that improved accuracy a bit, then glass bedded and refinished the stock, replaced the rear aperture with a national match aperture and trued the front sight. I did not shoot it a whole lot, but with premium ammo it is capable of excellent accuracy.
Thanks for the info. Looks like my receiver was produced in 1944. Looks like the H&R trigger group was produced 1953-56.
Last edited:
Patrick L
Member
Not to hijack this thread, but I was just wondering, has anyone here ACTUALLY EXPERIENCED the infamous "M1 Thumb"?
I've been shooting Garands since the late 80s and never have. In my experience, after shoving the full enbloc in with my thumb, I then have to then give the op rod a gentle nudge with the palm of my hand to chamber the first round.
Granted there were millions of M1s made, and my experience is limited to less than a half dozen specimens. I'm sure some rifles are tighter/looser than others. I just find it odd that everyone seems to talk about it, but I've never experienced or even seen it.
I've been shooting Garands since the late 80s and never have. In my experience, after shoving the full enbloc in with my thumb, I then have to then give the op rod a gentle nudge with the palm of my hand to chamber the first round.
Granted there were millions of M1s made, and my experience is limited to less than a half dozen specimens. I'm sure some rifles are tighter/looser than others. I just find it odd that everyone seems to talk about it, but I've never experienced or even seen it.
All my experience with Garand's come from post military they were rarely used when I enlisted in 1970. I'm sure the M-1 thumb happened in the stress of combat a time or two. I've never had it happen to me because when I load a clip I use two hands to do it.
LVSteve
Member
If you think M1 thumb is bad, you should read the accounts of getting the reload sequence wrong with an Egyptian Hakim.
Hakim hand?
It's certainly not uncommon for M-1s to have a mix of parts, one can only imagine how many times they were in a armorers hands and parts got switched.
I'm pleased that this one I just got it has most of it's original parts
with the exception of the stock which doesn't have the cartouche just a rack number. As mentioned in a post here it could have been restocked for ceremonial purposes because it's a good looking piece for a general service rifle.
Sistema1927
US Veteran
I have experienced "M1 Thumb" several times over the years. That is why my current Garand has the Holbrook Device installed.
Patrick L
Member
Ok thanks guys. I guess it just depends on the tolerances of each individual rifle.
Love em anyway, along with my 03s and my carbine!
Love em anyway, along with my 03s and my carbine!
I'm currently at 2 M1's. One is late wartime (1945) and the other is late pre-war (1940). The prewar is SA receiver but mismatch parts. The 1945 appears all SA throughout but unknown if original???
Regardless, they are lotsa fun... shooting, looking, buying, tinkering, etc.
Regardless, they are lotsa fun... shooting, looking, buying, tinkering, etc.
Frank46
US Veteran
One of my shipmates was in the Marine Landing Party and all were armed with Garands. When he came back from manoveres his thumb was wrapped like a mummy. Course the Marines were all armed with the M14. Watched our Gunnery sargent give a weapons training course out on the fantail to a bunch of pilots. for some of them the M14 terrified them. He grabs me and asks what is your shooting experience with the M14., None I replied. They used to save the 5 gallon foam cans cause they were already painted red. hands me a M14 loaded with ten rounds and says hit the can. First couple shots were misses and was trying to get the range. The other 8 shots sunk the can. Then he goes on to say ,this sailor has no experience with the M14 yet he sunk the can. Gotta bunch of dirty looks from those officers. Still had fun. Frank
My M1 was from 1944.
Petty beat up but had a new barrel replacement.
Shoots up good with all the ammo I got that was made in Greece in the
1950's.
Petty beat up but had a new barrel replacement.
Shoots up good with all the ammo I got that was made in Greece in the
1950's.
spad124
Member
My M1 is a service grade 1954 HRA with what I think is its original barrel. The barrel is dated to 1954 and so does the receiver. A friend bought it from the CMP then decided he didn't want such a late one. He knew I was looking for one and offered it to me. While my Garand was probably never fired in anger, the benefit is that the throat wear is 1 and muzzle wear is 0. Yes, it's an accurate rifle. Other than the HRA receiver and barrel the rest is CMP service grade mixmaster, mostly Springfield.
I believe my M1 was lend-leased To Greece. When my friend bought it the CMP was also selling HXP M2 Ball.
I believe my M1 was lend-leased To Greece. When my friend bought it the CMP was also selling HXP M2 Ball.
Very nice OP- I'm a sucker for military rifles with nice wood.
Obviously, you've never seen a MESSY shop!
Nice looking Garand
Maybe a better word would be cluttered...
. The shop is 12x20 and just flat running out of space for all my goodies.
BLACKHAWKNJ
Member
- Joined
- Oct 25, 2006
- Messages
- 6,216
- Reaction score
- 6,673
IIRC "M-1 Thumb" happens after the inspecting officer returns the rifle after completing "Inspection Arms". I had a couple of NCOs who had trained with the M-1 show me how to do it, takes practice-and alertness.
I have 2, September 1941 and May 1942. Neither is all original but they look like they have some stories to tell.
I have 2, September 1941 and May 1942. Neither is all original but they look like they have some stories to tell.
Last edited:
Similar threads
- Locked
