M&P 9mm accuracy issue for me

Wessels69p

Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2014
Messages
5
Reaction score
1
Hey guys,

I'm not trying to start drama here but actually think I have an issue. I bought my M&P 4.25" 9mm recently and have ran about 300 or more rounds through it. I noticed that my accuracy was way different from an old beretta I have but blamed it on me and my newness with the weapon. Last, night I went shooting again with some friends and still had the issue. I even picked a sig p2022 9mm and stamped the red and inner black at 7 yards with a full clip. I have never shot a sig before. I could not come close to this with my m&p. I find I have to aim at nearly the top of the outermost ring to get near the center.

Is it possible the sights are off that bad from the factory? They are fixed factory sights.

Anyway, just looking for advice here. I love the gun but can't seem to perform with it like anything else I have shot. What are my options?

Thanks, wade
 
Register to hide this ad
The sights being off would only account for Left-Right accuracy, not Up-Down accuracy. I'm not saying that it definitely isn't the pistol, but as seen with many who have this problem, it's possible that you are 'dipping' the barrel during trigger press... Possibly in anticipation to recoil.

Next time out, have someone slip a dummy round/Snap-Cap somewhere in the middle of your mag and have them watch your hands while you shoot. If the gun dips noticeably when you hit the 'dud'... It's you.

At 7 Yds, to be that far off, there would need to be a really bad barrel defect.
 
I'm not familiar with the M&P but responding to your general statement -- if the front site were too high, or the rear site too low, it would put the POA below the bullseye -- so you would have to aim high to hit the bullseye.
 
Wade,
Try shooting from a rest, and then have a friend do the same.
Different grip, different hand position on an M&P.
 
I will try shooting with a rest. It's just odd to me that I can be so far off at 7yards versus a beretta that I'm used to and a sig I literally picked up. Thanks fellas.
 
Smoke,
Left/right I could understand. I don't think they make any effort to sight the gun at the factory. Elevation is harder to figure.

Wade,
Make sure you're lining up the top of the front sight with the top of the rear channel. As I understand it, the dots are for rapid target acquisition only.
Isn't that right guys?
 
I will try shooting with a rest. It's just odd to me that I can be so far off at 7yards versus a beretta that I'm used to and a sig I literally picked up. Thanks fellas.

If this is your first plastic fantastic and you are used to shooting metal single-action pistols, it is VERY common to shoot low. An excellent IDPA/ESP shooter tried my M&P 9mm Pro and was very embarrassed at how poorly he shot. He was experienced enough to know he was breaking down on the shot during the long trigger pull. Since we had just shot a match, he knew it was not the gun.
 
What sight picture are you using? My son and I both use #3 on my M&P .40 and it is dead on at 25 feet. Try aligning your dots and covering the center of the target with the front dot.
 

Attachments

  • sight pic.png
    sight pic.png
    5.7 KB · Views: 201
Last edited:
I'm using the first one but have to aim the opposite (the top instead of the bottom). 2 or 3 and I would hit the bottom of the paper.
 
Is this a newly manufactured M&P? I remember reading that the first generation of the M&P 9s had accuracy issues. The fix was a new generation barrel.
 
installed a dmps/dpms (whichever) multi-spring recoil unit and my shooting improve noticably (mp9c). the recoil system package was marked CZ75, but sold as workable for the 9c. comes with two outer springs. the heavier one was best for me. 9c operates just fine with the new system (muzzle flip is way less). at 25ft, using the front dot over center of the target. the left/right drift is my fault.

cheers, ya'll
 
Is this a newly manufactured M&P? I remember reading that the first generation of the M&P 9s had accuracy issues. The fix was a new generation barrel.

Do you really believe everything you read? I have an M&P from early on and it's just fine...I'll believe what I see.

I'll go with this opinion on "accuracy".

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UVzSAm5VhfE
 
I have the same issue. My M&P shoots about 4-5 inches low. Nice tight low groups. Shoots that way for everyone who shoots it. Mine actually has a pretty good factory trigger. I love the Pistol but have to use a high 12 'O clock hold to hit bullseye. I was wondering if other height factory sights were available.
 
What accuracy problems? Seems to be a leading question.

That's kind of like asking someone if they've stopped beating their wife

I really like my M&Ps and have not had any accuracy issues with any of mine. However, many people report poor slide to barrel fit with the older 9mm models and benched groups that are much larger than other firearms when using the same ammo. I believe them, even though I have not personally experienced it.

Obviously the rifling in the older models was causing a problem, otherwise S&W wouldn't have changed it. They've also changed the barrel lockup design a few times. I wonder why...? Glock, Beretta, and H&K have never changed their rifling pitch. Why? Because there is no need to; it works fine. However, each of these manufacturers have modified other things? Why? Because it was causing problems.

The accuracy issues with the full size 9mm M&Ps are just like the brass to face issues with newer Glocks. The fanboys never want to blame the gun, but always blame the shooter, ammo, or planetary alignment. True, most gun issues are caused by some things other than the gun, but in some cases the gun can be the sole cause of the problem.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top