son-of-a-gun
Member
Of course, there's still the Marine Corps!
Semper Fi!

Semper Fi!

NO , No , no!
The flight suit is NOT a uniform! It's protective gear (nomex) and should not be worn by anyone except for 'gold wing' wearing aircrews (pilots , NFOs , aircrewmen) on active flight status and the 'ready' crew. A non-aviator wearing a flightbag is just more gender blind , fem-coddling , PC bullcrap!
Unless you have EARNED the right to wear GOLD WINGS , you DO NOT have the right to wear a flight suit or flight jacket.
NO , No , no!
The flight suit is NOT a uniform! It's protective gear (nomex) and should not be worn by anyone except for 'gold wing' wearing aircrews (pilots , NFOs , aircrewmen) on active flight status and the 'ready' crew. A non-aviator wearing a flightbag is just more gender blind , fem-coddling , PC bullcrap!
Unless you have EARNED the right to wear GOLD WINGS , you DO NOT have the right to wear a flight suit or flight jacket.
Spoken like a true officer! NOT!!
I wore one three times and I was in maintenance!
Troubleshooting an inflight fuel leak on a Benson tank on a C-130.
Trouble shooting a fuel line on an SR-71 while the engines were at MILITARY POWER.
Hot pit refuel of an F-15.
Gold Wing, hrrumph!You with the Gold Wings wouldn't be going anywhere if it was'nt for those of that us didn't wear them.
![]()
Its not just the military that is crazy for camo. I used to work at a national laboratory, and the security guard force there always wore camo. But their sole task was to safeguard big gray concrete buildings. The camo outfits made them very conspicuous in that environment.
This isn't my fight, but I suggest the two previous posters look up mkk41's avatar before slinging indignation. It isn't just officers to which he was referring as aircrew.
...I don't what service members you complainers see..."How about general officers on national television doing press conferences?
...After my 20 years of wearing fatigues and BDUs, let me tell you that I appreciate the fact that ACUs aren't starched and that the days of spit shined boots are gone.
What we have here is a generational values schism. That doesn't mean this poster is wrong...it just means that he and the previous posters ain't going to agree on this issue.
My daughter, EOD, and my nephew, Infantry, Afghan Vet. Even in camos they still look sharp. It's all in how you present yourself. I'm a Nam Vet and I hated all that starch.
DW
Doesn't have anything to do with his avatar. It has to do with the arrogance and short sightedness of his last sentence.
I'm done with this before I get "scolded". It ain't gonna turn out well.
I have served twice in Iraq and once in Afghanistan. Here's my take: What happened is two major wars and a Global War on Terror. Service members in tactical units have been deployed over and over in the past 10 years. Practicality becomes more necessary than ceremony and pomp. Our ACU uniforms, while not as sharp as starched shirts and trousers, are utilitarian. Desert boots don't require polishing and are actually usable in the terrain we deploy to. Many soldiers "grow up" in the military as lower enlisted in a deployed environment, where soldiers live together much closer, even with their NCOs and officers. Salutes and "Yes Sir!"s are replaced by interaction on a more personal level. I have no idea what things were like in the 60's and 70's, that's way before my time. This is just my experience in today's Army.
Military bearing is certainly not as sharp as it used to be, and I agree our uniforms don't look very good. But the military has had more important things on it's mind the past decade. As the wars wind down, Commanders and CSMs will start bringing the garrison side of military life back in full force.
All that said, I was in the 82nd for a few years, and I can tell you Drill and Ceremony is alive and well. More than once I stood in formation for hours in the baking Carolina sun, helping to keep that part of military life alive.